Jual Sparepart Genset Lovol Murah di Pontianak Hubungi : 0821 - 1310 - 3112/(021) 9224 - 2423 PT. Tribuana Diesel Adalah penjualan Generating-Set (genset) berkualitas import (builtup) bagi anda yang membutuhkan product berkualitas serta pengadaan yang cepat urgent tanpa berbelit-belit, Genset kami di lengkapi dengan dokumen Certificate Of Original , Manual book engine dan manual book generator, Kami sediakan Genset kapasitas 10 Kva - 650Kva (ANDA PESAN KAMI ANTAR).

Jual Sparepart Genset Lovol Murah di Pontianak Kami juga menerima pembuatan box silent dan perakitan diesel generator set. Produk kami meliputi berbagai diesel generator set model open, silent lokal yang ukuranya menyesuaikan lokasi pondasi genset, mobile/ trailer . Sebagian besar mesin kami menggunakan Merk : Perkins, Cummins, Deutz, Lovol, Isuzu Foton dengan generator Leroy Somer, Stamford, kualitas terbaik brushless alternator. Jual Sparepart Genset Lovol Murah di Pontianak

Jual Sparepart Genset Lovol Murah di Pontianak

Tag :
Jual Genset Lovol | Jual Sparepart Genset Lovol Murah di Pontianak | Jual Genset Lovol kav 45 kva | jual genset lovol Kap 70 Kva Prime Power type 1004TG | Genset Lovol | Genset Lovol kav 45 kva | Jual Genset cummins |

Jual genset LOVOL OPEN DAN SILENT KAP 45KVA -175KVA bergaransi dan berkualitas di Subulussalam

Jual genset LOVOL OPEN DAN SILENT KAP 45KVA -175KVA bergaransi dan berkualitas di Subulussalam Hubungi : 0821 - 1310 - 3112/(021) 9224 - 2423 PT. Tribuana Diesel Adalah penjualan Generating-Set (genset) berkualitas import (builtup) bagi anda yang membutuhkan product berkualitas serta pengadaan yang cepat urgent tanpa berbelit-belit, Genset kami di lengkapi dengan dokumen Certificate Of Original , Manual book engine dan manual book generator, Kami sediakan Genset kapasitas 10 Kva - 650Kva (ANDA PESAN KAMI ANTAR). Jual genset LOVOL OPEN DAN SILENT KAP 45KVA -175KVA bergaransi dan berkualitas di Subulussalam

saco-indonesia.com, Bagai jatuh tertimpa tangga, inilah yang telah dialami oleh Reza yang berusia 19 tahun , yang telah menjadi

saco-indonesia.com, Bagai jatuh tertimpa tangga, inilah yang telah dialami oleh Reza yang berusia 19 tahun , yang telah menjadi korban pemukulan di Jalan Dewi Sartika, Cililitan, Kramatjati, Senin (17/2) kemarin . Niat hati ingin memarahi sopir Kopaja yang akan menabraknya, pemuda ini malah dipukuli gerombolan ormas yang ada di dalam kendaraan tersebut.

Kapolsek Kramatjati, Kompol Andini telah menuturkan, peristiwa itu telah terjadi sekitar pukul. 18:30. Reza telah menjadi bulan-bulanan penumpang yang tidak terima memarahi sopir atas mobil yang ditumpanginya. “Korban luka memar di wajahnya ,” kata kapolsek Senin (17/2) kemarin .

Diceritakan Kapolsek, kejadian itu bermula saat korban yang akan menyeberang di samping Pusat Grosir Cililitan (PGC) nyaris ditabrak Kopaja 57 jurusan Kampung Rambutan – Blok M. Korban yang kaget pun langsung menggebrak bus 3/4 tersebut. “Dia teriak bawa mobilnya biasa saja dong,” kata Andini menirukan korban.

Tanpa disadari, mobil tersebut ternyata berisi penumpang dari salah satu ormas. Tanpa komando, penumpang yang ada langsung turun untuk menghakimi Reza. “Korban kabur melarikan diri namun dapat ditangkap gerombolan itu dan langsung memukulinya,” ujar Andini lagi.

Beruntung, tiga orang warga yang ada di sekitar dapat melerai aksi brutal kelompok ormas tersebut. Korban langsung dilarikan ke RS Budi Asih. “Korban pun saat ini masih shock dan sulit dimintai keterangan atas kasus pengeroyokan yang telah dialaminya,” imbuhnya.

Polisi juga masih memburu pelaku pengeroyokan tersebut. Kasus inipun saat ini masih ditangani oleh Polsek Kramatjati. “Saksi yang berjumlah tiga orang itu yang kita mintai informasinya untuk dapat meringkus pelaku,” tuturnya.


Editor : Dian Sukmawati

Berbagai dukungan untuk dapat mengusung Joko Widodo (Jokowi) mencalonkan diri sebagai presiden semakin gencar. Sejumlah elemen m

Berbagai dukungan untuk dapat mengusung Joko Widodo (Jokowi) mencalonkan diri sebagai presiden semakin gencar. Sejumlah elemen masyarakat telah mulai membentuk organisasi-organisasi demi menunjukkan dukungan mereka terhadap Jokowi. Meski telah mendapat dukungan besar dari masyarakat, tak lantas membuat Jokowi berbesar hati. Dengan nada santai, Jokowi telah mengungkapkan aksi mereka adalah bentuk demokrasi yang nyata di tanah air, sehingga tidak bisa dihalang-halangi. "Ya itulah demokrasi, saya tidak bisa membubarkan kalau saya tidak setuju. Mosok ada yang dukung tapi saya malah nolak-nolak. Tidak mungkin," tegasnya di Balai Kota DKI Jakarta, Senin (10/3). Jokowi juga mengaku tidak merasa tersanjung dengan banyaknya dukungan masyarakat untuk dapat mencapreskan dirinya. Meski begitu, dia juga tidak merasa terganggu, melainkan telah memberikan kebebasan sepenuhnya. Ketika dikonfirmasi mengenai rencana dirinya untuk dapat melakukan kunjungan atau bersilaturahmi dengan pendukungnya, Jokowi juga mengatakan, belum sempat. Karena masih banyak pekerjaan di Jakarta. "Orang pekerjaan kita aja banyak, ini hujan lagi," tutupnya. Seperti yang telah diketahui, Srikandi Jokowi yang beranggotakan para perempuan pelopor Jokowi Presiden dideklarasikan di Tugu Monumen Nasional (Monas) kemarin . Di mana dalam acara ini telah dihadiri ratusan perempuan dari berbagai daerah. ''Jumlah perempuan lebih besar dibanding laki-laki, sehingga perempuan lebih menentukan nasib dan masa depan bangsa ini," kata Ketua Umum Srikandi Jokowi, Vivi di Monas. Vivi juga mengatakan, bangsa ini juga sudah lama terlena dengan janji para politisi, yang selalu terdengar nyaring menjelang pemilihan umum. Tetapi apa yang terjadi, keadaan tak berubah, jumlah orang miskin semakin banyak.

Mr. Napoleon was a self-taught musician whose career began in earnest with the orchestra led by Chico Marx of the Marx Brothers.

WASHINGTON — The former deputy director of the C.I.A. asserts in a forthcoming book that Republicans, in their eagerness to politicize the killing of the American ambassador to Libya, repeatedly distorted the agency’s analysis of events. But he also argues that the C.I.A. should get out of the business of providing “talking points” for administration officials in national security events that quickly become partisan, as happened after the Benghazi attack in 2012.

The official, Michael J. Morell, dismisses the allegation that the United States military and C.I.A. officers “were ordered to stand down and not come to the rescue of their comrades,” and he says there is “no evidence” to support the charge that “there was a conspiracy between C.I.A. and the White House to spin the Benghazi story in a way that would protect the political interests of the president and Secretary Clinton,” referring to the secretary of state at the time, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

But he also concludes that the White House itself embellished some of the talking points provided by the Central Intelligence Agency and had blocked him from sending an internal study of agency conclusions to Congress.

Photo
 
Michael J. Morell Credit Mark Wilson/Getty Images

“I finally did so without asking,” just before leaving government, he writes, and after the White House released internal emails to a committee investigating the State Department’s handling of the issue.

A lengthy congressional investigation remains underway, one that many Republicans hope to use against Mrs. Clinton in the 2016 election cycle.

In parts of the book, “The Great War of Our Time” (Twelve), Mr. Morell praises his C.I.A. colleagues for many successes in stopping terrorist attacks, but he is surprisingly critical of other C.I.A. failings — and those of the National Security Agency.

Soon after Mr. Morell retired in 2013 after 33 years in the agency, President Obama appointed him to a commission reviewing the actions of the National Security Agency after the disclosures of Edward J. Snowden, a former intelligence contractor who released classified documents about the government’s eavesdropping abilities. Mr. Morell writes that he was surprised by what he found.

Advertisement

“You would have thought that of all the government entities on the planet, the one least vulnerable to such grand theft would have been the N.S.A.,” he writes. “But it turned out that the N.S.A. had left itself vulnerable.”

He concludes that most Wall Street firms had better cybersecurity than the N.S.A. had when Mr. Snowden swept information from its systems in 2013. While he said he found himself “chagrined by how well the N.S.A. was doing” compared with the C.I.A. in stepping up its collection of data on intelligence targets, he also sensed that the N.S.A., which specializes in electronic spying, was operating without considering the implications of its methods.

“The N.S.A. had largely been collecting information because it could, not necessarily in all cases because it should,” he says.

The book is to be released next week.

Mr. Morell was a career analyst who rose through the ranks of the agency, and he ended up in the No. 2 post. He served as President George W. Bush’s personal intelligence briefer in the first months of his presidency — in those days, he could often be spotted at the Starbucks in Waco, Tex., catching up on his reading — and was with him in the schoolhouse in Florida on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, when the Bush presidency changed in an instant.

Mr. Morell twice took over as acting C.I.A. director, first when Leon E. Panetta was appointed secretary of defense and then when retired Gen. David H. Petraeus resigned over an extramarital affair with his biographer, a relationship that included his handing her classified notes of his time as America’s best-known military commander.

Mr. Morell says he first learned of the affair from Mr. Petraeus only the night before he resigned, and just as the Benghazi events were turning into a political firestorm. While praising Mr. Petraeus, who had told his deputy “I am very lucky” to run the C.I.A., Mr. Morell writes that “the organization did not feel the same way about him.” The former general “created the impression through the tone of his voice and his body language that he did not want people to disagree with him (which was not true in my own interaction with him),” he says.

But it is his account of the Benghazi attacks — and how the C.I.A. was drawn into the debate over whether the Obama White House deliberately distorted its account of the death of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens — that is bound to attract attention, at least partly because of its relevance to the coming presidential election. The initial assessments that the C.I.A. gave to the White House said demonstrations had preceded the attack. By the time analysts reversed their opinion, Susan E. Rice, now the national security adviser, had made a series of statements on Sunday talk shows describing the initial assessment. The controversy and other comments Ms. Rice made derailed Mr. Obama’s plan to appoint her as secretary of state.

The experience prompted Mr. Morell to write that the C.I.A. should stay out of the business of preparing talking points — especially on issues that are being seized upon for “political purposes.” He is critical of the State Department for not beefing up security in Libya for its diplomats, as the C.I.A., he said, did for its employees.

But he concludes that the assault in which the ambassador was killed took place “with little or no advance planning” and “was not well organized.” He says the attackers “did not appear to be looking for Americans to harm. They appeared intent on looting and conducting some vandalism,” setting fires that killed Mr. Stevens and a security official, Sean Smith.

Mr. Morell paints a picture of an agency that was struggling, largely unsuccessfully, to understand dynamics in the Middle East and North Africa when the Arab Spring broke out in late 2011 in Tunisia. The agency’s analysts failed to see the forces of revolution coming — and then failed again, he writes, when they told Mr. Obama that the uprisings would undercut Al Qaeda by showing there was a democratic pathway to change.

“There is no good explanation for our not being able to see the pressures growing to dangerous levels across the region,” he writes. The agency had again relied too heavily “on a handful of strong leaders in the countries of concern to help us understand what was going on in the Arab street,” he says, and those leaders themselves were clueless.

Moreover, an agency that has always overvalued secretly gathered intelligence and undervalued “open source” material “was not doing enough to mine the wealth of information available through social media,” he writes. “We thought and told policy makers that this outburst of popular revolt would damage Al Qaeda by undermining the group’s narrative,” he writes.

Instead, weak governments in Egypt, and the absence of governance from Libya to Yemen, were “a boon to Islamic extremists across both the Middle East and North Africa.”

Mr. Morell is gentle about most of the politicians he dealt with — he expresses admiration for both Mr. Bush and Mr. Obama, though he accuses former Vice President Dick Cheney of deliberately implying a connection between Al Qaeda and Iraq that the C.I.A. had concluded probably did not exist. But when it comes to the events leading up to the Bush administration’s decision to go to war in Iraq, he is critical of his own agency.

Mr. Morell concludes that the Bush White House did not have to twist intelligence on Saddam Hussein’s alleged effort to rekindle the country’s work on weapons of mass destruction.

“The view that hard-liners in the Bush administration forced the intelligence community into its position on W.M.D. is just flat wrong,” he writes. “No one pushed. The analysts were already there and they had been there for years, long before Bush came to office.”

Artikel lainnya »