Gantungan kayu adalah tambahan
indah untuk lemari apapun. Mereka tampak besar, seragam dan efisien saat menggantung. Mereka
Gantungan kayu adalah tambahan indah untuk lemari apapun. Mereka tampak besar, seragam
dan efisien saat menggantung. Mereka dapat mengisi ruang lemari Anda dengan sempurna dan bahkan
melindungi pakaian anda dari jamur dan jamur. Dengan begitu banyak pilihan di pasar saat ini,
Anda mungkin bertanya-tanya mana kayu gantungan yang harus Anda pilih?
jenis standar kayu yang digunakan untuk gantungan Kayu yang beredar saat ini dipasaran, masing-
masing bisa datang dalam nuansa dan Finishing Warna yang berbeda, mari lihat lebih dekat pada
fungsi dari setiap jenis kayu.
Pine akan menjadi salah satu pilihan Anda yang paling
murah. Gantungan kayu Pinus memiliki tekstur kayu yang benar-benar bagus. Mereka adalah tahan
lama dan kuat, tetapi mereka terbuat dari kayu lunak. Anda dapat mengharapkan beberapa penyok
terjadi selama bertahun-tahun, tapi gantungan itu sendiri harus bertahan sangat lama. Gantungan
kayu pinus biasanya ditawarkan dalam warna cahaya alami, atau mungkin dicat hitam atau putih.
Gantungan pinus yang ringan dan dapat membuat tambahan yang bagus untuk lemari apapun.
Walnut gantungan kayu yang sangat bagus. Mereka biasanya datang dalam warna, coklat gelap
kemerahan. Warna alami kenari sangat gelap dibandingkan kayu lainnya. Walnut adalah kayu padat
yang tidak akan penyok atau mudah tergores. Mereka membuat gantungan sangat tahan lama dan indah
yang yakin untuk canggih lemari Anda.
Cedar adalah salah satu gantungan sepanjang masa
yang paling populer kayu, dan untuk alasan yang baik. Cedar adalah gantungan kayu merah yang
indah. Mereka biasanya tidak dilapisi, bernoda atau dipernis. Hal ini karena kayu cedar memiliki
banyak sifat yang membuatnya ideal untuk gantungan kayu. Cedar memiliki aroma yang alami mengusir
ngengat. Ini adalah alternatif yang lebih aman untuk bola ngengat berbahaya. Cedar memiliki bau
kayu yang menyenangkan bahwa banyak orang cinta. Tidak hanya menjaga pakaian Anda berbau segar,
tapi cedar membantu untuk menghentikan pertumbuhan jamur dan jamur di lemari Anda. Jika Anda
membeli gantungan kayu untuk lemari penyimpanan, seperti lemari mantel, maka Anda benar-benar
harus mempertimbangkan gantungan kayu di lemari mereka.
Nilai Seni Pada Gantungan
Baju kita akan melihat lebih dekat pada itu, dibuat dengan baik kayu gantungan pakaian adalah
objek yang luar biasa dari kedua desain dan utilitas. Apa yang tampaknya menjadi objek yang
tampaknya biasa sebenarnya dapat dianggap cukup sebuah penelitian di estetika, dengan kurva
elegan dan satin finish halus. Bahkan, begitu banyak menakjubkan berkualitas tinggi keahlian
masuk ke dalam pembuatan setiap gantungan pakaian yang benar-benar dapat setiap gantungan
dikatakan sebuah karya seni dalam dirinya sendiri.
Alasan seperti tingkat tinggi
keahlian adalah bahwa setiap gantungan kayu harus dibuat dengan standar yang sangat menuntut
kualitas dalam rangka untuk itu untuk memiliki tingkat tinggi dari daya tahan. Ini adalah kasus
fungsi formulir berikut: gantungan indahnya dapat diharapkan untuk melakukan serta terlihat.
Pertama-tama, kayu yang digunakan dalam gantungan baju harus kualitas tak tertandingi.
Setiap bagian kayu harus diperiksa sangat hati-hati, memastikan bahwa kualitas yang melekat alami
dari kekuatan dan daya tahan yang utuh. Serat dan Urat di gantungan baju kayu harus halus dan
seragam, dengan sedikit sentuhan tidak tajam yang bisa merobek atau merusak setelan Pakaian. Kayu
yang baik juga harus dikeringkan dan diperlakukan dengan baik sehingga memenangkan Kayu dari
waktu ke waktu.
Kedua, setiap gantungan kayu harus hati-hati dipotong dan diukir ke
dalam bentuk yang optimal yang diperlukan untuk jenis pakaian yang memang ditujukan. Hal ini
tentu saja tidak ada prestasi kecil, seperti gantungan harus ringan dan seimbang, namun cukup
kuat untuk membawa berat setelan penuh untuk waktu yang lama.
Terakhir, gantungan harus
dilapisi dengan finishing yang melengkapi komposisi kayunya serta bahan pakaian yang akan datang
ke dalam kontak dengan itu. Ada berbagai jenis tehnik pengecatan, semi-gloss, dan mengkilap,
serta berbagai warna yang tersedia.
Ketika membeli gantungan baju kayu, memilih produk
yang dirancang dengan baik yang tidak hanya terlihat baik tetapi juga akan melindungi pakaian
Anda untuk waktu yang lama. Setelah semua, fungsi utama kayu gantungan pakaian adalah untuk
membawa yang terbaik dari pakaian apapun, terlepas dari apakah itu di toko pakaian high-end atau
dalam lemari lemari rendah hati.
Agen Hanger menawarkan Pembuatan Wooden Hangers dari
kayu berkualitas tinggi produk gantungan baju, didukung pengalaman di bidang manufaktur kustom
gantungan mewah. Unit Usaha kami juga mendistribusikan benda cantik siap pakai gantungan serta
gantungan sepenuhnya disesuaikan agar sesuai dengan selera yang spesifik setiap klien.
Pemerintah Mendadak Datang ke DPR, Untuk Membahas APBN-P
pejabat pemerintahan di sektor keuangan mendadak datang ke kompleks Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat RI
untuk bertemu dengan pimpinan parlemen, Senin (3/6/2013).
Indonesia.com — Para pejabat pemerintahan di sektor keuangan mendadak datang
ke kompleks Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat RI untuk bertemu dengan pimpinan parlemen, Senin (3/6/2013).
Menteri Koordinator Perekonomian Hatta Rajasa, Menteri Keuangan Chatib Basri, Kepala Bappenas
Armida Alisjahbana, Wakil Menteri Keuangan Mahendra Siregar dan Kepala Badan Kebijakan Fiskal
Kemenkeu Bambang Brodjonegoro sudah tiba di kompleks DPR RI, Senin pagi.
Hatta mengaku tidak ada yang spesial dalam pertemuan yang disebutnya pertemuan informal
"Kami ketemu, tidak ada yang spesial. Ini pertemuan informal,
tidak ada yang bersifat formal. Biasanya kalau informal lewat telepon," ujarnya.
Saat disinggung tentang adanya penolakan rencana pemerintah memasukkan dana
kompensasi kenaikan harga bahan bakar minyak (BBM), Hatta menampik adanya penolakan karena
rencana dana kompensasi tersebut masih dibahas di parlemen untuk masuk dalam Anggaran Pendapatan
dan Belanja Negara Perubahan (APBN-P) 2013.
"DPR itu intinya adalah
paripurna dan komisi. Kalau fraksi-fraksi silakan, kan dinamika politik seperti itu. Kami
harapkan APBN-P ini kan kepentingan bersama, kepentingan negara," kata Hatta.
Sementara itu, Wakil Menteri Keuangan Mahendra Siregar menyatakan bahwa pertemuan kali ini
adalah persiapan pembahasan APBN-P.
"Kami mendampingi Pak Menko. Mungkin
ada beberapa hal yang perlu disampaikan supaya proses dalam konteks APBN-P jalan sesuai
Mahendra mengaku ingin mengetahui perkembangan
pembahasan APBN-P di parlemen sehingga bisa diselesaikan tepat waktu. Sementara itu, baik Chatib
Basri dan juga Ketua DPR Marzuki Alie tak mau buka suara tentang pertemuan mendadak ini.
"Tidak ada yang khusus," ujar Chatib terburu-buru sambil masuk ke dalam
Seyogyanya, bersamaan dengan pertemuan mendadak ini, dilakukan pula
rapat pembahasan rancangan RAPBN -P di Badan Anggaran. Namun, rapat itu akhirnya ditunda karena
seluruh pejabat keuangan bertemu pimpinan DPR. Pimpinan Banggar seperti Wakil Ketua Banggar
Tamsil Linrung dari Fraksi PKS pun hadir dalam pertemuan itu. Diperkirakan, dalam pertemuan pagi
ini, pemerintah dan pimpinan DPR akan membahas tentang rencana memasukkan dana kompensasi
dalam rancangan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara Perubahan (RAPBN-P).
Seperti diketahui, rencananya pemerintah akan menaikkan harga BBM pada awal Juni 2013. Namun,
rencana itu akhirnya ditunda hingga minggu ketiga bulan Juni 2013. Pemerintah dan DPR hingga
kini masih menggodok rencana memasukkan dana bantuan langsung sementara masyarakat (BLSM) ke
dalam kerangka APBN-P yang nilainya sekitar Rp 11,6 triliun.
Editor :Liwon Maulana
G.O.P. Hopefuls Now Aiming to Woo the Middle Class
WASHINGTON — The last three men to win the Republican nomination have been the prosperous son of a president (George W. Bush), a senator who could not recall how many homes his family owned (John McCain of Arizona; it was seven) and a private equity executive worth an estimated $200 million (Mitt Romney).
The candidates hoping to be the party’s nominee in 2016 are trying to create a very different set of associations. On Sunday, Ben Carson, a retired neurosurgeon, joined the presidential field.
Senator Marco Rubio of Florida praises his parents, a bartender and a Kmart stock clerk, as he urges audiences not to forget “the workers in our hotel kitchens, the landscaping crews in our neighborhoods, the late-night janitorial staff that clean our offices.”
Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin, a preacher’s son, posts on Twitter about his ham-and-cheese sandwiches and boasts of his coupon-clipping frugality. His $1 Kohl’s sweater has become a campaign celebrity in its own right.
Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky laments the existence of “two Americas,” borrowing the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s phrase to describe economically and racially troubled communities like Ferguson, Mo., and Detroit.
“Some say, ‘But Democrats care more about the poor,’ ” Mr. Paul likes to say. “If that’s true, why is black unemployment still twice white unemployment? Why has household income declined by $3,500 over the past six years?”
We are in the midst of the Empathy Primary — the rhetorical battleground shaping the Republican presidential field of 2016.
Harmed by the perception that they favor the wealthy at the expense of middle-of-the-road Americans, the party’s contenders are each trying their hardest to get across what the elder George Bush once inelegantly told recession-battered voters in 1992: “Message: I care.”
Their ability to do so — less bluntly, more sincerely — could prove decisive in an election year when power, privilege and family connections will loom large for both parties.
Questions of understanding and compassion cost Republicans in the last election. Mr. Romney, who memorably dismissed the “47 percent” of Americans as freeloaders, lost to President Obama by 63 percentage points among voters who cast their ballots for the candidate who “cares about people like me,” according to exit polls.
And a Pew poll from February showed that people still believe Republicans are indifferent to working Americans: 54 percent said the Republican Party does not care about the middle class.
That taint of callousness explains why Senator Ted Cruz of Texas declared last week that Republicans “are and should be the party of the 47 percent” — and why another son of a president, Jeb Bush, has made economic opportunity the centerpiece of his message.
With his pedigree and considerable wealth — since he left the Florida governor’s office almost a decade ago he has earned millions of dollars sitting on corporate boards and advising banks — Mr. Bush probably has the most complicated task making the argument to voters that he understands their concerns.
On a visit last week to Puerto Rico, Mr. Bush sounded every bit the populist, railing against “elites” who have stifled economic growth and innovation. In the kind of economy he envisions leading, he said: “We wouldn’t have the middle being squeezed. People in poverty would have a chance to rise up. And the social strains that exist — because the haves and have-nots is the big debate in our country today — would subside.”
Republicans’ emphasis on poorer and working-class Americans now represents a shift from the party’s longstanding focus on business owners and “job creators” as the drivers of economic opportunity.
This is intentional, Republican operatives said.
In the last presidential election, Republicans rushed to defend business owners against what they saw as hostility by Democrats to successful, wealthy entrepreneurs.
“Part of what you had was a reaction to the Democrats’ dehumanization of business owners: ‘Oh, you think you started your plumbing company? No you didn’t,’ ” said Grover Norquist, the conservative activist and president of Americans for Tax Reform.
But now, Mr. Norquist said, Republicans should move past that. “Focus on the people in the room who know someone who couldn’t get a job, or a promotion, or a raise because taxes are too high or regulations eat up companies’ time,” he said. “The rich guy can take care of himself.”
Democrats argue that the public will ultimately see through such an approach because Republican positions like opposing a minimum-wage increase and giving private banks a larger role in student loans would hurt working Americans.
“If Republican candidates are just repeating the same tired policies, I’m not sure that smiling while saying it is going to be enough,” said Guy Cecil, a Democratic strategist who is joining a “super PAC” working on behalf of Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Republicans have already attacked Mrs. Clinton over the wealth and power she and her husband have accumulated, caricaturing her as an out-of-touch multimillionaire who earns hundreds of thousands of dollars per speech and has not driven a car since 1996.
Mr. Walker hit this theme recently on Fox News, pointing to Mrs. Clinton’s lucrative book deals and her multiple residences. “This is not someone who is connected with everyday Americans,” he said. His own net worth, according to The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, is less than a half-million dollars; Mr. Walker also owes tens of thousands of dollars on his credit cards.
But showing off a cheap sweater or boasting of a bootstraps family background not only helps draw a contrast with Mrs. Clinton’s latter-day affluence, it is also an implicit argument against Mr. Bush.
Mr. Walker, who featured a 1998 Saturn with more than 100,000 miles on the odometer in a 2010 campaign ad during his first run for governor, likes to talk about flipping burgers at McDonald’s as a young person. His mother, he has said, grew up on a farm with no indoor plumbing until she was in high school.
Mr. Rubio, among the least wealthy members of the Senate, with an estimated net worth of around a half-million dollars, uses his working-class upbringing as evidence of the “exceptionalism” of America, “where even the son of a bartender and a maid can have the same dreams and the same future as those who come from power and privilege.”
Mr. Cruz alludes to his family’s dysfunction — his parents, he says, were heavy drinkers — and recounts his father’s tale of fleeing Cuba with $100 sewn into his underwear.
Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey notes that his father paid his way through college working nights at an ice cream plant.
But sometimes the attempts at projecting authenticity can seem forced. Mr. Christie recently found himself on the defensive after telling a New Hampshire audience, “I don’t consider myself a wealthy man.” Tax returns showed that he and his wife, a longtime Wall Street executive, earned nearly $700,000 in 2013.
The story of success against the odds is a political classic, even if it is one the Republican Party has not been able to tell for a long time. Ronald Reagan liked to say that while he had not been born on the wrong side of the tracks, he could always hear the whistle. Richard Nixon was fond of reminding voters how he was born in a house his father had built.
“Probably the idea that is most attractive to an average voter, and an idea that both Republicans and Democrats try to craft into their messages, is this idea that you can rise from nothing,” said Charles C. W. Cooke, a writer for National Review.
There is a certain delight Republicans take in turning that message to their advantage now.
“That’s what Obama did with Hillary,” Mr. Cooke said. “He acknowledged it openly: ‘This is ridiculous. Look at me, this one-term senator with dark skin and all of America’s unsolved racial problems, running against the wife of the last Democratic president.”
Dave Goldberg Was Lifelong Womens Advocate
Even as a high school student, Dave Goldberg was urging female classmates to speak up. As a young dot-com executive, he had one girlfriend after another, but fell hard for a driven friend named Sheryl Sandberg, pining after her for years. After they wed, Mr. Goldberg pushed her to negotiate hard for high compensation and arranged his schedule so that he could be home with their children when she was traveling for work.
Mr. Goldberg, who died unexpectedly on Friday, was a genial, 47-year-old Silicon Valley entrepreneur who built his latest company, SurveyMonkey, from a modest enterprise to one recently valued by investors at $2 billion. But he was also perhaps the signature male feminist of his era: the first major chief executive in memory to spur his wife to become as successful in business as he was, and an essential figure in “Lean In,” Ms. Sandberg’s blockbuster guide to female achievement.
Over the weekend, even strangers were shocked at his death, both because of his relatively young age and because they knew of him as the living, breathing, car-pooling center of a new philosophy of two-career marriage.
“They were very much the role models for what this next generation wants to grapple with,” said Debora L. Spar, the president of Barnard College. In a 2011 commencement speech there, Ms. Sandberg told the graduates that whom they married would be their most important career decision.
In the play “The Heidi Chronicles,” revived on Broadway this spring, a male character who is the founder of a media company says that “I don’t want to come home to an A-plus,” explaining that his ambitions require him to marry an unthreatening helpmeet. Mr. Goldberg grew up to hold the opposite view, starting with his upbringing in progressive Minneapolis circles where “there was woman power in every aspect of our lives,” Jeffrey Dachis, a childhood friend, said in an interview.
The Goldberg parents read “The Feminine Mystique” together — in fact, Mr. Goldberg’s father introduced it to his wife, according to Ms. Sandberg’s book. In 1976, Paula Goldberg helped found a nonprofit to aid children with disabilities. Her husband, Mel, a law professor who taught at night, made the family breakfast at home.
Later, when Dave Goldberg was in high school and his prom date, Jill Chessen, stayed silent in a politics class, he chastised her afterward. He said, “You need to speak up,” Ms. Chessen recalled in an interview. “They need to hear your voice.”
Years later, when Karin Gilford, an early employee at Launch Media, Mr. Goldberg’s digital music company, became a mother, he knew exactly what to do. He kept giving her challenging assignments, she recalled, but also let her work from home one day a week. After Yahoo acquired Launch, Mr. Goldberg became known for distributing roses to all the women in the office on Valentine’s Day.
Ms. Sandberg, who often describes herself as bossy-in-a-good-way, enchanted him when they became friendly in the mid-1990s. He “was smitten with her,” Ms. Chessen remembered. Ms. Sandberg was dating someone else, but Mr. Goldberg still hung around, even helping her and her then-boyfriend move, recalled Bob Roback, a friend and co-founder of Launch. When they finally married in 2004, friends remember thinking how similar the two were, and that the qualities that might have made Ms. Sandberg intimidating to some men drew Mr. Goldberg to her even more.
Over the next decade, Mr. Goldberg and Ms. Sandberg pioneered new ways of capturing information online, had a son and then a daughter, became immensely wealthy, and hashed out their who-does-what-in-this-marriage issues. Mr. Goldberg’s commute from the Bay Area to Los Angeles became a strain, so he relocated, later joking that he “lost the coin flip” of where they would live. He paid the bills, she planned the birthday parties, and both often left their offices at 5:30 so they could eat dinner with their children before resuming work afterward.
Friends in Silicon Valley say they were careful to conduct their careers separately, politely refusing when outsiders would ask one about the other’s work: Ms. Sandberg’s role building Facebook into an information and advertising powerhouse, and Mr. Goldberg at SurveyMonkey, which made polling faster and cheaper. But privately, their work was intertwined. He often began statements to his team with the phrase “Well, Sheryl said” sharing her business advice. He counseled her, too, starting with her salary negotiations with Mark Zuckerberg.
“I wanted Mark to really feel he stretched to get Sheryl, because she was worth it,” Mr. Goldberg explained in a 2013 “60 Minutes” interview, his Minnesota accent and his smile intact as he offered a rare peek of the intersection of marriage and money at the top of corporate life.
While his wife grew increasingly outspoken about women’s advancement, Mr. Goldberg quietly advised the men in the office on family and partnership matters, an associate said. Six out of 16 members of SurveyMonkey’s management team are female, an almost unheard-of ratio among Silicon Valley “unicorns,” or companies valued at over $1 billion.
When Mellody Hobson, a friend and finance executive, wrote a chapter of “Lean In” about women of color for the college edition of the book, Mr. Goldberg gave her feedback on the draft, a clue to his deep involvement. He joked with Ms. Hobson that she was too long-winded, like Ms. Sandberg, but aside from that, he said he loved the chapter, she said in an interview.
By then, Mr. Goldberg was a figure of fascination who inspired a “where can I get one of those?” reaction among many of the women who had read the best seller “Lean In.” Some lamented that Ms. Sandberg’s advice hinged too much on marrying a Dave Goldberg, who was humble enough to plan around his wife, attentive enough to worry about which shoes his young daughter would wear, and rich enough to help pay for the help that made the family’s balancing act manageable.
Now that he is gone, and Ms. Sandberg goes from being half of a celebrated partnership to perhaps the business world’s most prominent single mother, the pages of “Lean In” carry a new sting of loss.
“We are never at 50-50 at any given moment — perfect equality is hard to define or sustain — but we allow the pendulum to swing back and forth between us,” she wrote in 2013, adding that they were looking forward to raising teenagers together.
“Fortunately, I have Dave to figure it out with me,” she wrote.