Jual Sparepart Genset Doosan di Lebak Hubungi : 0821 - 1310 - 3112/(021) 9224 - 2423 PT. Tribuana Diesel Adalah penjualan Generating-Set (genset) berkualitas import (builtup) bagi anda yang membutuhkan product berkualitas serta pengadaan yang cepat urgent tanpa berbelit-belit, Genset kami di lengkapi dengan dokumen Certificate Of Original , Manual book engine dan manual book generator, Kami sediakan Genset kapasitas 10 Kva - 650Kva (ANDA PESAN KAMI ANTAR).
Jual Sparepart Genset Doosan di Lebak Kami juga menerima pembuatan box silent dan perakitan diesel generator set. Produk kami meliputi berbagai diesel generator set model open, silent lokal yang ukuranya menyesuaikan lokasi pondasi genset, mobile/ trailer . Sebagian besar mesin kami menggunakan Merk : Perkins, Cummins, Deutz, Lovol, Isuzu Foton dengan generator Leroy Somer, Stamford, kualitas terbaik brushless alternator. Jual Sparepart Genset Doosan di Lebak
GENSET CUMMIS 1500KVA Murah di Tanjungbalai Hubungi : 0821 - 1310 - 3112/(021) 9224 - 2423 PT. Tribuana Diesel Adalah penjualan Generating-Set (genset) berkualitas import (builtup) bagi anda yang membutuhkan product berkualitas serta pengadaan yang cepat urgent tanpa berbelit-belit, Genset kami di lengkapi dengan dokumen Certificate Of Original , Manual book engine dan manual book generator, Kami sediakan Genset kapasitas 10 Kva - 650Kva (ANDA PESAN KAMI ANTAR). GENSET CUMMIS 1500KVA Murah di Tanjungbalai
Anak Perempuan Mesir Tewas Usai Disunat
Seorang bocah perempuan
berusia 13 tahun meninggal dunia saat disunat di sebuah desa terpencil di Provinsi Daqahliya, di
timur laut Kairo.
KAIRO, Saco-Indonesia.com — Seorang bocah
perempuan berusia 13 tahun meninggal dunia saat disunat di sebuah desa terpencil di Provinsi
Daqahliya, di timur laut Kairo. Demikian sejumlah media Mesir melaporkan, Senin (10/6/2013).
"Kami menyerahkan anak perempuan kami kepada dokter dan perawat. Setelah 15
menit kemudian, perawat membawa putri kami keluar dari ruang operasi ke sebuah ruang lain
bersama tiga anak perempuan lain yang juga disunat," kata Mohammad Ibrahim, ayah anak
perempuan malang itu.
"Saya menunggu selama setengah jam, berharap putri
saya akan bangun, tetapi ternyata dia tidak bangun seperti anak-anak yang lain," tambah
Dokter yang menyunat Suhair al-Bata'a, nama anak perempuan itu,
sebelumnya juga menyunat kakak perempuan Suhair dua tahun lalu.
tidak ingin apa pun. Saya hanya ingin dokter itu bertanggung jawab dan kami ingin keadilan untuk
putri kami," kata ibu Suhair, Hasanat Naeem Fawzy, kepada harian al-Masry al-
Polisi kemudian memeriksa dokter itu dan memerintahkan dilakukan
otopsi untuk memastikan penyebab kematian bocah malang tersebut.
"Petugas dinas kesehatan mengatakan, penyebab kematian diduga adalah penurunan tekanan
darah yang drastis yang kemudian mengakibatkan trauma," ujar kuasa hukum keluarga Suhair,
Dewan Nasional Perempuan Mesir mengecam keras insiden ini dan
menganggap kelalaian ini sebagai sebuah tindakan kriminal yang menunjukkan sebuah
Dewan juga menyerukan agar Pemerintah Mesir
menggelar penyelidikan masalah ini dan menjatuhkan hukuman setimpal terhadap orang yang
Organisasi Anak-anak Sedunia (Unicef) perwakilan Mesir
juga mengecam tragedi sunat ini. Unicef mengatakan, sunat perempuan tidak memiliki landasan
medis atau agama yang kuat.
Sementara itu, pejabat Departemen Kesehatan di
Daqahliya, Abdel Wahab Sulaeman, mengatakan, pihaknya belum mendapatkan laporan soal insiden
Namun, dia mengatakan praktik sunat perempuan adalah tindakan yang
melanggar hukum Mesir.
Pada 1996, Mesir telah mengkriminalkan sunat
perempuan, tetapi masih banyak warga negeri itu yang melakukan sunat perempuan secara ilegal.
Pada 2009, Pemerintah Mesir menahan seorang pria pelaku penyunatan perempuan.
Ini adalah penahanan pertama sejak sunat perempuan dilarang.
Pria itu ditahan
karena melakukan penyunatan ilegal terhadap seorang bocah perempuan berusia 11 tahun di wilayah
Minya, sekitar 600 kilometer sebelah selatan Kairo.
saco-indonesia.com, Internazionale telah berhasil untuk memenangi pertandingan Derby Della Madoninna kontra AC Milan. Gol tungga
saco-indonesia.com, Internazionale telah berhasil untuk memenangi pertandingan Derby Della Madoninna kontra AC Milan. Gol tunggal Rodrigo Palacio di menit ke 86 telah menjadi gol satu-satunya dalam pertandingan tersebut yang telah diselenggarakan di Stadion Giuseppe Meazza (23/12).
Babak pertama dimulai Internazionale langsung melancarakan serangnan melaui Fredy Guarin tetapi dapat digagalkan oleh AC Milan. Tak ingin kalah, Milan juga mencoba menjebol pertahanan Internazionale melalui Mario Balotelli tetapi tendanganya masih membentur Juan Jesus.
Di menit ke 10, Balotellli juga mempunyai peluang emas, tetapi sayangnya tendangan Balotelli di dalam kotak penalti Internazionale masih menjauh di atas gawang Handanovic. skor masih 0-0.
Menit ke 11, sepakan bola deras dari Kaka untungnya masih dapat diatasi oleh Handanovic. 20 menit awal Internazionale nampaknya tertekan oleh serangan dari AC Milan. Inter juga mencoba untuk keluar dari sarangnya, melalui umapn taider ke dalam kotak penalti AC Milan, sundulan Nagatomo masih melebar dari gawang Abbiati.
Di menit ke 30, kedua tim masih imbang dengan skor 0-0. Milan juga masih mendominasi pertandingan, kali ini Muntari ingin mencoba peruntungannya tetapi masih melebar dari gawang Internazionale. Permainan kedua tim sudah menjurus kasar, hal ini telah terlihat dari beberapa kali pelanggaran yang dilakukan oleh kedua tim.
Di menit ke 40, Palacio telah dijatuhkan di dalam kotak penalti oleh Muntari, tetapi wasit tidak melihat pelanggaran. Hingga babak pertama berakhir skor tetap 0-0.
Babak kedua dimulai, menit ke 47, Palacio telah berhasil mengirimkan operan kepada Jonathan, pemain asal Brasil ini pun juga langsung menembakkan bola dengan keras, sayangnya masih bisa ditangkap dengan mudah oleh Abbiati. Inter hampir saja telah membuka keran golnya melalui sundulan Campagnaro yang sudah mengarah ke gawang, untungnya masih bisa dihalau oleh Zapata.
Mario Balotelli juga bisa menjadi ancaman nyata bagi Internazionale, beberapa kali Balotelli telah mempunyai peluang di depan gawang Handanovic sayangnya Balotelli belum bisa mengoptimalkan peluang. Di menit ke 65 Nagatomo juga melepaskan tendangan keras ke gawang Abbiati, sayangnya bola juga masih mengarah tepat ke arah kiper.
Di menit ke 72, Balotelli telah melakukan tendangan bebas, tendangannya masih mengarah jauh dari gawang Handanovic. Kedua tim nampaknya masih sulit untuk bisa menembus pertahanan masing-masing tim. Sehingga serangan kedua tim masih gamapng untuk dipatahkan.
Memasuki menit ke 80, beberapa kali sisi kanan pertahanan AC Milan telah menjadi pusat serangan awal Inter. Palacio hampir saja mencetak gol pertama bagi Inter, untungnya tendangan datar Palacio masih bisa ditepis oleh Abbiati di menit ke 81.
Menit ke 86 akhirnya Inter dapat menjebol gawang AC Milan, berawal dari umpan datar Guarin, Palacio dengan mudah memasukkan bola ke gawang. 1-0 bagi Internazionale.
Sadar tertinggal, AC Milan semakin menyerang, sayangnya dari beberapa serangan dapat dipatahkan oleh pemain bertahan Internazionle. Menit ke 90 Muntari harus di kartu merah karena mendorong Kuzmanovic terlebih dahulu. Hingga babak kedua berakhir, Inter tetap memimpin skor 1-0.
AC MILAN (4-3-2-1): Abbiati; De Sciglio, Bonera, Zapata, Constant (Emanuelson 45"); Poli (Pazzini 87"), De Jong, Muntari; Saponara (Matri 76"), Kaka; Balotelli.
Editor : Dian Sukmawati
Finding Scandal in New York and New Jersey, but No Shame
From sea to shining sea, or at least from one side of the Hudson to the other, politicians you have barely heard of are being accused of wrongdoing. There were so many court proceedings involving public officials on Monday that it was hard to keep up.
In Newark, two underlings of Gov. Chris Christie were arraigned on charges that they were in on the truly deranged plot to block traffic leading onto the George Washington Bridge.
Ten miles away, in Lower Manhattan, Dean G. Skelos, the leader of the New York State Senate, and his son, Adam B. Skelos, were arrested by the Federal Bureau of Investigation on accusations of far more conventional political larceny, involving a job with a sewer company for the son and commissions on title insurance and bond work.
The younger man managed to receive a 150 percent pay increase from the sewer company even though, as he said on tape, he “literally knew nothing about water or, you know, any of that stuff,” according to a criminal complaint the United States attorney’s office filed.
The bridge traffic caper is its own species of crazy; what distinguishes the charges against the two Skeloses is the apparent absence of a survival instinct. It is one thing not to know anything about water or that stuff. More remarkable, if true, is the fact that the sewer machinations continued even after the former New York Assembly speaker, Sheldon Silver, was charged in January with taking bribes disguised as fees.
It was by then common gossip in political and news media circles that Senator Skelos, a Republican, the counterpart in the Senate to Mr. Silver, a Democrat, in the Assembly, could be next in line for the criminal dock. “Stay tuned,” the United States attorney, Preet Bharara said, leaving not much to the imagination.
Even though the cat had been unmistakably belled, Skelos father and son continued to talk about how to advance the interests of the sewer company, though the son did begin to use a burner cellphone, the kind people pay for in cash, with no traceable contracts.
That was indeed prudent, as prosecutors had been wiretapping the cellphones of both men. But it would seem that the burner was of limited value, because by then the prosecutors had managed to secure the help of a business executive who agreed to record calls with the Skeloses. It would further seem that the business executive was more attentive to the perils of pending investigations than the politician.
Through the end of the New York State budget negotiations in March, the hopes of the younger Skelos rested on his father’s ability to devise legislation that would benefit the sewer company. That did not pan out. But Senator Skelos did boast that he had haggled with Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, a Democrat, in a successful effort to raise a $150 million allocation for Long Island to $550 million, for what the budget called “transformative economic development projects.” It included money for the kind of work done by the sewer company.
The lawyer for Adam Skelos said he was not guilty and would win in court. Senator Skelos issued a ringing declaration that he was unequivocally innocent.
THIS was also the approach taken in New Jersey by Bill Baroni, a man of great presence and eloquence who stopped outside the federal courthouse to note that he had taken risks as a Republican by bucking his party to support paid family leave, medical marijuana and marriage equality. “I would never risk my career, my job, my reputation for something like this,” Mr. Baroni said. “I am an innocent man.”
The lawyer for his co-defendant, Bridget Anne Kelly, the former deputy chief of staff to Mr. Christie, a Republican, said that she would strongly rebut the charges.
Perhaps they had nothing to do with the lane closings. But neither Mr. Baroni nor Ms. Kelly addressed the question of why they did not return repeated calls from the mayor of Fort Lee, N.J., begging them to stop the traffic tie-ups, over three days.
That silence was a low moment. But perhaps New York hit bottom faster. Senator Skelos, the prosecutors charged, arranged to meet Long Island politicians at the wake of Wenjian Liu, a New York City police officer shot dead in December, to press for payments to the company employing his son.
Sometimes it seems as though for some people, the only thing to be ashamed of is shame itself.
But an unusual assortment of players, including furniture makers, the Chinese government, Republicans from states with a large base of furniture manufacturing and even some Democrats who championed early regulatory efforts, have questioned the E.P.A. proposal. The sustained opposition has held sway, as the agency is now preparing to ease key testing requirements before it releases the landmark federal health standard.
The E.P.A.’s five-year effort to adopt this rule offers another example of how industry opposition can delay and hamper attempts by the federal government to issue regulations, even to control substances known to be harmful to human health.
Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen that can also cause respiratory ailments like asthma, but the potential of long-term exposure to cause cancers like myeloid leukemia is less well understood.
The E.P.A.’s decision would be the first time that the federal government has regulated formaldehyde inside most American homes.
“The stakes are high for public health,” said Tom Neltner, senior adviser for regulatory affairs at the National Center for Healthy Housing, who has closely monitored the debate over the rules. “What we can’t have here is an outcome that fails to confront the health threat we all know exists.”
The proposal would not ban formaldehyde — commonly used as an ingredient in wood glue in furniture and flooring — but it would impose rules that prevent dangerous levels of the chemical’s vapors from those products, and would set testing standards to ensure that products sold in the United States comply with those limits. The debate has sharpened in the face of growing concern about the safety of formaldehyde-treated flooring imported from Asia, especially China.
What is certain is that a lot of money is at stake: American companies sell billions of dollars’ worth of wood products each year that contain formaldehyde, and some argue that the proposed regulation would impose unfair costs and restrictions.
Determined to block the agency’s rule as proposed, these industry players have turned to the White House, members of Congress and top E.P.A. officials, pressing them to roll back the testing requirements in particular, calling them redundant and too expensive.
“There are potentially over a million manufacturing jobs that will be impacted if the proposed rule is finalized without changes,” wrote Bill Perdue, the chief lobbyist at the American Home Furnishings Alliance, a leading critic of the testing requirements in the proposed regulation, in one letter to the E.P.A.
Industry opposition helped create an odd alignment of forces working to thwart the rule. The White House moved to strike out key aspects of the proposal. Subsequent appeals for more changes were voiced by players as varied as Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, and Senator Roger Wicker, Republican of Mississippi, as well as furniture industry lobbyists.
Hurricane Katrina in 2005 helped ignite the public debate over formaldehyde, after the deadly storm destroyed or damaged hundreds of thousands of homes along the Gulf of Mexico, forcing families into temporary trailers provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
The displaced storm victims quickly began reporting respiratory problems, burning eyes and other issues, and tests then confirmed high levels of formaldehyde fumes leaking into the air inside the trailers, which in many cases had been hastily constructed.
Public health advocates petitioned the E.P.A. to issue limits on formaldehyde in building materials and furniture used in homes, given that limits already existed for exposure in workplaces. But three years after the storm, only California had issued such limits.
Industry groups like the American Chemistry Council have repeatedly challenged the science linking formaldehyde to cancer, a position championed by David Vitter, the Republican senator from Louisiana, who is a major recipient of chemical industry campaign contributions, and whom environmental groups have mockingly nicknamed “Senator Formaldehyde.”
By 2010, public health advocates and some industry groups secured bipartisan support in Congress for legislation that ordered the E.P.A. to issue federal rules that largely mirrored California’s restrictions. At the time, concerns were rising over the growing number of lower-priced furniture imports from Asia that might include contaminated products, while also hurting sales of American-made products.
Maneuvering began almost immediately after the E.P.A. prepared draft rules to formally enact the new standards.
White House records show at least five meetings in mid-2012 with industry executives — kitchen cabinet makers, chemical manufacturers, furniture trade associations and their lobbyists, like Brock R. Landry, of the Venable law firm. These parties, along with Senator Vitter’s office, appealed to top administration officials, asking them to intervene to roll back the E.P.A. proposal.
The White House Office of Management and Budget, which reviews major federal regulations before they are adopted, apparently agreed. After the White House review, the E.P.A. “redlined” many of the estimates of the monetary benefits that would be gained by reductions in related health ailments, like asthma and fertility issues, documents reviewed by The New York Times show.
As a result, the estimated benefit of the proposed rule dropped to $48 million a year, from as much as $278 million a year. The much-reduced amount deeply weakened the agency’s justification for the sometimes costly new testing that would be required under the new rules, a federal official involved in the effort said.
“It’s a redlining blood bath,” said Lisa Heinzerling, a Georgetown University Law School professor and a former E.P.A. official, using the Washington phrase to describe when language is stricken from a proposed rule. “Almost the entire discussion of these potential benefits was excised.”
“That’s a huge difference,” said Luke Bolar, a spokesman for Mr. Vitter, of the reduced estimated financial benefits, saying the change was “clearly highlighting more mismanagement” at the E.P.A.
The review’s outcome galvanized opponents in the furniture industry. They then targeted a provision that mandated new testing of laminated wood, a cheaper alternative to hardwood. (The California standard on which the law was based did not require such testing.)
But E.P.A. scientists had concluded that these laminate products — millions of which are sold annually in the United States — posed a particular risk. They said that when thin layers of wood, also known as laminate or veneer, are added to furniture or flooring in the final stages of manufacturing, the resulting product can generate dangerous levels of fumes from often-used formaldehyde-based glues.
Industry executives, outraged by what they considered an unnecessary and financially burdensome level of testing, turned every lever within reach to get the requirement removed. It would be particularly onerous, they argued, for small manufacturers that would have to repeatedly interrupt their work to do expensive new testing. The E.P.A. estimated that the expanded requirements for laminate products would cost the furniture industry tens of millions of dollars annually, while the industry said that the proposed rule over all would cost its 7,000 American manufacturing facilities over $200 million each year.
“A lot of people don’t seem to appreciate what a lot of these requirements do to a small operation,” said Dick Titus, executive vice president of the Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers Association, whose members are predominantly small businesses. “A 10-person shop, for example, just really isn’t equipped to handle that type of thing.”
Big industry players also weighed in. Executives from companies including La-Z-Boy, Hooker Furniture and Ashley Furniture all flew to Washington for a series of meetings with the offices of lawmakers including House Speaker John Boehner, Republican of Ohio, and about a dozen other lawmakers, asking several of them to sign a letter prepared by the industry to press the E.P.A. to back down, according to an industry report describing the lobbying visit.
The industry lobbyists also held their own meeting at E.P.A. headquarters, and they urged Jim Jones, who oversaw the rule-making process as the assistant administrator for the agency’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, to visit a North Carolina furniture manufacturing plant. According to the trade group, Mr. Jones told them that the visit had “helped the agency shift its thinking” about the rules and how laminated products should be treated.
The resistance was particularly intense from lawmakers like Mr. Wicker of Mississippi, whose state is home to major manufacturing plants owned by Ashley Furniture Industries, the world’s largest furniture maker, and who is one of the biggest recipients in Congress of donations from the industry’s trade association. Asked if the political support played a role, a spokesman for Mr. Wicker replied: “Thousands of Mississippians depend on the furniture manufacturing industry for their livelihoods. Senator Wicker is committed to defending all Mississippians from government overreach.”
Individual companies like Ikea also intervened, as did the Chinese government, which claimed that the new rule would create a “great barrier” to the import of Chinese products because of higher costs.
Perhaps the most surprising objection came from Senator Boxer, of California, a longtime environmental advocate, whose office questioned why the E.P.A.’s rule went further than her home state’s in seeking testing on laminated products. “We did not advocate an outcome, other than safety,” her office said in a statement about why the senator raised concerns. “We said ‘Take a look to see if you have it right.’ ”
Safety advocates say that tighter restrictions — like the ones Ms. Boxer and Mr. Wicker, along with Representative Doris Matsui, a California Democrat, have questioned — are necessary, particularly for products coming from China, where items as varied as toys and Christmas lights have been found to violate American safety standards.
While Mr. Neltner, the environmental advocate who has been most involved in the review process, has been open to compromise, he has pressed the E.P.A. not to back down entirely, and to maintain a requirement that laminators verify that their products are safe.
An episode of CBS’s “60 Minutes” in March brought attention to the issue when it accused Lumber Liquidators, the discount flooring retailer, of selling laminate products with dangerous levels of formaldehyde. The company has disputed the show’s findings and test methods, maintaining that its products are safe.
“People think that just because Congress passed the legislation five years ago, the problem has been fixed,” said Becky Gillette, who then lived in coastal Mississippi, in the area hit by Hurricane Katrina, and was among the first to notice a pattern of complaints from people living in the trailers. “Real people’s faces and names come up in front of me when I think of the thousands of people who could get sick if this rule is not done right.”
An aide to Ms. Matsui rejected any suggestion that she was bending to industry pressure.
“From the beginning the public health has been our No. 1 concern,” said Kyle J. Victor, an aide to Ms. Matsui.
But further changes to the rule are likely, agency officials concede, as they say they are searching for a way to reduce the cost of complying with any final rule while maintaining public health goals. The question is just how radically the agency will revamp the testing requirement for laminated products — if it keeps it at all.
“It’s not a secret to anybody that is the most challenging issue,” said Mr. Jones, the E.P.A. official overseeing the process, adding that the health consequences from formaldehyde are real. “We have to reduce those exposures so that people can live healthy lives and not have to worry about being in their homes.”