Jual Genset Perkins Murah di Malang Hubungi : 0821 - 1310 - 3112/(021) 9224 - 2423 PT. Tribuana Diesel Adalah penjualan Generating-Set (genset) berkualitas import (builtup) bagi anda yang membutuhkan product berkualitas serta pengadaan yang cepat urgent tanpa berbelit-belit, Genset kami di lengkapi dengan dokumen Certificate Of Original , Manual book engine dan manual book generator, Kami sediakan Genset kapasitas 10 Kva - 650Kva (ANDA PESAN KAMI ANTAR).
Jual Genset Perkins Murah di Malang Kami juga menerima pembuatan box silent dan perakitan diesel generator set. Produk kami meliputi berbagai diesel generator set model open, silent lokal yang ukuranya menyesuaikan lokasi pondasi genset, mobile/ trailer . Sebagian besar mesin kami menggunakan Merk : Perkins, Cummins, Deutz, Lovol, Isuzu Foton dengan generator Leroy Somer, Stamford, kualitas terbaik brushless alternator. Jual Genset Perkins Murah di Malang
genset perkins CHINA/LOVOL Kap 135 kva Prime power type 1006TAG1A bergaransi dan berkualitas di Kepahiang Hubungi : 0821 - 1310 - 3112/(021) 9224 - 2423 PT. Tribuana Diesel Adalah penjualan Generating-Set (genset) berkualitas import (builtup) bagi anda yang membutuhkan product berkualitas serta pengadaan yang cepat urgent tanpa berbelit-belit, Genset kami di lengkapi dengan dokumen Certificate Of Original , Manual book engine dan manual book generator, Kami sediakan Genset kapasitas 10 Kva - 650Kva (ANDA PESAN KAMI ANTAR). genset perkins CHINA/LOVOL Kap 135 kva Prime power type 1006TAG1A bergaransi dan berkualitas di Kepahiang
Setelah Bebas Julia perez, Siap Ganti nama
Julia Perez akan
menghirup udara bebas pada 17 Juni mendatang. Setelah bebas, pelantun 'Belah Duren' itu siap
untuk mengganti namanya. Jadi apa ya?
Saat berbincang-bincang dengan detikHot di Rutan
Pondok Bambu, Selasa (21/5/2013), perempuan yang akrab disapa Jupe itu mengaku akan mengganti
namanya dengan nama Julia Riche.
"Julia Riche, aku terinspirasi dari komik kesukaanku
'Richie Rich'. Rich kan kaya, jadi nama sekaligus doa," ujar pemilik nama asli Yuli Rachmawati
Julia Perez akan menghirup udara bebas pada 17 Juni mendatang. Setelah
bebas, pelantun 'Belah Duren' itu siap untuk mengganti namanya. Jadi apa ya?
Saat berbincang-bincang dengan detikHot di Rutan Pondok Bambu, Selasa (21/5/2013), perempuan
yang akrab disapa Jupe itu mengaku akan mengganti namanya dengan nama Julia Riche.
"Julia Riche, aku terinspirasi dari komik kesukaanku 'Richie Rich'. Rich kan kaya,
jadi nama sekaligus doa," ujar pemilik nama asli Yuli Rachmawati seraya tertawa.
Jupe sebenarnya punya alasan tersendiri kenapa dirinya mau mengganti namanya itu.
Jupe ingin melepas nama Perez untuk menghormati sang kekasih, Gaston Castano. Jupe diketahui
mendapat nama Perez dari suaminya dulu, Damien Perez.
"Aku kan harus
menghormatinya, sebenarnya sudah lama pengen ganti tapi baru nemu nama itu sekarang. Selama ini
dia (Gaston) diam saja, tapi aku tahu dia sebenarnya tidak suka," tuturnya.
Selain mengganti nama, Jupe berniat untuk menyuguhkan imejnya yang baru dan lebih fresh.
Untuk mewujudkan keinginannya itu, ia berkolaborasi dengan desainer ternama.
"Kalau yang ini, nanti saja ya. Biar kejutan, pokoknya beda banget deh," singkat
bintang film 'Gending Sriwijaya' itu.
IBU DAN BAYI DISERGAP OLEH PERAMPOK
saco-indonesia.com, Ibu muda saat terlelap bersama bayinya telah diikat oleh dua penjahat yang masuk ke rumahnya di Tambun Selat
saco-indonesia.com, Ibu muda saat terlelap bersama bayinya telah diikat oleh dua penjahat yang masuk ke rumahnya di Tambun Selatan, Kabupaten Bekasi, Selasa (7/1) dinihari. Setelah berhasil melumpuhkan Siti Khotimah yang berusia 23 tahun , penjahat yang masuk dengan cara mencongkel jendela menguras uang Rp 2,5 juta dan 26 gram perhiasan emas. Kasusnya telah dilaporkan korban ke Polsek Tambun.
Menurut Ny Siti, ia yang saat itu terlelap bersama bayi yang berusia 8 bulan terbangun saat mendengar suara gaduh di dekat jendela kamar. Memang saat itu Ny Siti hanya tidur bersama bayinya saja, sementara sang suami sedang bekerja.
Saat ibu muda ini bangkit, tiba-tiba dua lelaki masuk ke dalam rumahnya. “Mau apa kamu masuk ke rumah saya,” tanya Ny Siti keheranan.
Namun belum juga sempat dijawab, satu pelaku langsung menodongkan senjata tajam golok ke leher ibu rumahtangga ini.Penjahat kemudian telah mengikat kedua tangan korban pakai gesper fan melakban mulut Ny Siti. Sementara sang jabang bayi juga masih terlelap di ranjang.
Setelah berhasil melumpuhkan korban, kawanan penjahat telah mengacak-acak isi lemari mengambil uang dan perhiasan emas. Berhasil dengan aksinya, penjahat tersebut kabur.
Kanitserse Polsek Tambun Iptu Rudi Wira saat ditanya wartawan juga mengatakan masih harus memburu pelakunya. Ia telah menduga kawanan penjahat masuk mencongkel jendela.
Editor : Dian Sukmawati
William Price Fox, Admired Southern Novelist and Humorist, Dies at 89
Mr. Fox, known for his well-honed countrified voice, wrote about things dear to South Carolina and won over Yankee critics.
Ex-C.I.A. Official Rebuts Republican Claims on Benghazi Attack in ‘The Great War of Our Time’
WASHINGTON — The former deputy director of the C.I.A. asserts in a forthcoming book that Republicans, in their eagerness to politicize the killing of the American ambassador to Libya, repeatedly distorted the agency’s analysis of events. But he also argues that the C.I.A. should get out of the business of providing “talking points” for administration officials in national security events that quickly become partisan, as happened after the Benghazi attack in 2012.
The official, Michael J. Morell, dismisses the allegation that the United States military and C.I.A. officers “were ordered to stand down and not come to the rescue of their comrades,” and he says there is “no evidence” to support the charge that “there was a conspiracy between C.I.A. and the White House to spin the Benghazi story in a way that would protect the political interests of the president and Secretary Clinton,” referring to the secretary of state at the time, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
But he also concludes that the White House itself embellished some of the talking points provided by the Central Intelligence Agency and had blocked him from sending an internal study of agency conclusions to Congress.
“I finally did so without asking,” just before leaving government, he writes, and after the White House released internal emails to a committee investigating the State Department’s handling of the issue.
A lengthy congressional investigation remains underway, one that many Republicans hope to use against Mrs. Clinton in the 2016 election cycle.
In parts of the book, “The Great War of Our Time” (Twelve), Mr. Morell praises his C.I.A. colleagues for many successes in stopping terrorist attacks, but he is surprisingly critical of other C.I.A. failings — and those of the National Security Agency.
Soon after Mr. Morell retired in 2013 after 33 years in the agency, President Obama appointed him to a commission reviewing the actions of the National Security Agency after the disclosures of Edward J. Snowden, a former intelligence contractor who released classified documents about the government’s eavesdropping abilities. Mr. Morell writes that he was surprised by what he found.
“You would have thought that of all the government entities on the planet, the one least vulnerable to such grand theft would have been the N.S.A.,” he writes. “But it turned out that the N.S.A. had left itself vulnerable.”
He concludes that most Wall Street firms had better cybersecurity than the N.S.A. had when Mr. Snowden swept information from its systems in 2013. While he said he found himself “chagrined by how well the N.S.A. was doing” compared with the C.I.A. in stepping up its collection of data on intelligence targets, he also sensed that the N.S.A., which specializes in electronic spying, was operating without considering the implications of its methods.
“The N.S.A. had largely been collecting information because it could, not necessarily in all cases because it should,” he says.
Mr. Morell was a career analyst who rose through the ranks of the agency, and he ended up in the No. 2 post. He served as President George W. Bush’s personal intelligence briefer in the first months of his presidency — in those days, he could often be spotted at the Starbucks in Waco, Tex., catching up on his reading — and was with him in the schoolhouse in Florida on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, when the Bush presidency changed in an instant.
Mr. Morell twice took over as acting C.I.A. director, first when Leon E. Panetta was appointed secretary of defense and then when retired Gen. David H. Petraeus resigned over an extramarital affair with his biographer, a relationship that included his handing her classified notes of his time as America’s best-known military commander.
Mr. Morell says he first learned of the affair from Mr. Petraeus only the night before he resigned, and just as the Benghazi events were turning into a political firestorm. While praising Mr. Petraeus, who had told his deputy “I am very lucky” to run the C.I.A., Mr. Morell writes that “the organization did not feel the same way about him.” The former general “created the impression through the tone of his voice and his body language that he did not want people to disagree with him (which was not true in my own interaction with him),” he says.
But it is his account of the Benghazi attacks — and how the C.I.A. was drawn into the debate over whether the Obama White House deliberately distorted its account of the death of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens — that is bound to attract attention, at least partly because of its relevance to the coming presidential election. The initial assessments that the C.I.A. gave to the White House said demonstrations had preceded the attack. By the time analysts reversed their opinion, Susan E. Rice, now the national security adviser, had made a series of statements on Sunday talk shows describing the initial assessment. The controversy and other comments Ms. Rice made derailed Mr. Obama’s plan to appoint her as secretary of state.
The experience prompted Mr. Morell to write that the C.I.A. should stay out of the business of preparing talking points — especially on issues that are being seized upon for “political purposes.” He is critical of the State Department for not beefing up security in Libya for its diplomats, as the C.I.A., he said, did for its employees.
But he concludes that the assault in which the ambassador was killed took place “with little or no advance planning” and “was not well organized.” He says the attackers “did not appear to be looking for Americans to harm. They appeared intent on looting and conducting some vandalism,” setting fires that killed Mr. Stevens and a security official, Sean Smith.
Mr. Morell paints a picture of an agency that was struggling, largely unsuccessfully, to understand dynamics in the Middle East and North Africa when the Arab Spring broke out in late 2011 in Tunisia. The agency’s analysts failed to see the forces of revolution coming — and then failed again, he writes, when they told Mr. Obama that the uprisings would undercut Al Qaeda by showing there was a democratic pathway to change.
“There is no good explanation for our not being able to see the pressures growing to dangerous levels across the region,” he writes. The agency had again relied too heavily “on a handful of strong leaders in the countries of concern to help us understand what was going on in the Arab street,” he says, and those leaders themselves were clueless.
Moreover, an agency that has always overvalued secretly gathered intelligence and undervalued “open source” material “was not doing enough to mine the wealth of information available through social media,” he writes. “We thought and told policy makers that this outburst of popular revolt would damage Al Qaeda by undermining the group’s narrative,” he writes.
Instead, weak governments in Egypt, and the absence of governance from Libya to Yemen, were “a boon to Islamic extremists across both the Middle East and North Africa.”
Mr. Morell is gentle about most of the politicians he dealt with — he expresses admiration for both Mr. Bush and Mr. Obama, though he accuses former Vice President Dick Cheney of deliberately implying a connection between Al Qaeda and Iraq that the C.I.A. had concluded probably did not exist. But when it comes to the events leading up to the Bush administration’s decision to go to war in Iraq, he is critical of his own agency.
Mr. Morell concludes that the Bush White House did not have to twist intelligence on Saddam Hussein’s alleged effort to rekindle the country’s work on weapons of mass destruction.
“The view that hard-liners in the Bush administration forced the intelligence community into its position on W.M.D. is just flat wrong,” he writes. “No one pushed. The analysts were already there and they had been there for years, long before Bush came to office.”