saco-indonesia.com, Warga Perumahan Dewata Permai, Desa Sading, Kecamatan Mengwi, Badung, Bali, telah dikejutkan dengan temuan u
saco-indonesia.com, Warga Perumahan Dewata Permai, Desa Sading, Kecamatan Mengwi, Badung, Bali, telah dikejutkan dengan temuan ular sanca sepanjang 2,7 meter tak jauh dari permukiman mereka.
Hewan berbisa itu telah ditemukan tersangkut pancing yang sengaja dipasang warga lantaran sebelumnya telah menduga hewan tersebut berkeliaran di saluran irigasi di depan perumahan.
"Sehari sebelumnya, waktu mencari ayam piaraan saya, di sekitar lokasi, kok terdengar ada bunyi dan gerakan hewan seperti biawak bergerak cepat di saluran irigasi, " kata Budiono, warga perumahan, Selasa (4/2/2014).
Lantaran penasaran, dia langsung mencari ke mana hewan tersebut lari namun tidak kunjung ditemukan. Karena telah meyakini ada hewan berbahaya di sekitar tempat tinggal, sehingga Budiono telah memutuskan menangkapnya. Apalagi, anak-anak kerap bermain di sekitar lokasi untuk sekedar mencari ikan dan aktivitas lainnya.
Dipasanglah pancing di sekitar saluran air yang cukup jernih dengan dua mata pancing.
"Saya umpankan daging ayam, ketika saya cek lagi ke lokasi, ternyata hewan itu ular yang cukup panjang yang tersangkut pancing," imbuh pria asal Mojokerto, Jawa Timur itu.
Akhirnya, warga beramai-ramai untuk menangkap ular sanca atau phyton dengan warna warni hitam kecoklatan, abu-abu dengan bintik putih yang masih hidup. Setelah dengan susah payah mengeluarkan mata pancing yang menancap di leher ular, binatang melata itu kemudian diamankan dimasukkan karung. Binatang bersisik itu setelah diukur panjangnya mencapai 2,7 meter dan beratnya sekira 4,2 kilogram.
Temuan ular itu karuan telah menjadi tontonan warga perumahan terlebih anak-anak yang terlihat penasaran dengan hewan berbahaya itu. Setelah dipastikan aman, tak sedikit anak-anak tertarik sekedar memegang, mengelus tubuh ular tersebut. "Kalau tidak ditangkap, sangat membahayakan, apalagi anak-anak sering bermain di lokasi," jelasnya.
Untuk sementara, ular yang sudah terluka parah terkena pancing telah diamankankan oleh warga. Apakah nantinya akan dipelihara atau dijual, kata Budiono masih akan melihat perkembangan.
Editor : Dian Sukmawati
saco-indonesia.com, Tewasnya Feby Lorita yang berusia 31 tahun , telah membuat pelaku kebingungan, jasad perempuan malang terseb
saco-indonesia.com, Tewasnya Feby Lorita yang berusia 31 tahun , telah membuat pelaku kebingungan, jasad perempuan malang tersebut kemudian dimasukkan ke dalam mobil Nisan March F 1356 KA dan selama beberapa hari, dibawa berkeliling Jakarta, Depok dan Bekasi oleh Asido Simangunsong.
“Saya cuma bingung saja mau dibunag kemana. Soalnya mayat itu juga saya bawa pulang lagi ke apartemen, tapi saya biarkan di dalam mobil,” ujarnya.
Berniat untuk dapat melarikan diri, Asido kembali ke unit apartemen Feby dan mengambil televisi serta CPU komputer milik Feby, setelah sebelumnya menjarah perhiasan, uang dan identitas milik korban. “Semuanya saya jual seharga Rp3 juta. Sementara TV dan CPU dititipkan di rumah pacar saya,” imbuhnya.
Menurut dia, karena saat itu di dalam mobil juga sudah mulai tercium bau busuk, ia pun berniat untuk membuang jasad Feby. Sambil membawa mobil berkeliling, Asido pun telah memikirkan lokasi untuk membuang jasad Feby tersebut. Saat itulah ia bertemu dengan kakak kandungnya, Daniel Simangunsong dan mengaku bahwa Feby adalah korban tabrak larinya. “Saya minta bantuan sama dia (Daniel) untuk dapat membantu membuang mayat tersebut,” tuturnya.
Pada Sabtu (25/1) dinihari, keduanya pun berkeliling ke sejumlah tempat dan mencari lokasi untuk membuang jasad Feby. Menurut Asido, saat melintas di kawasan Kalimalang, Jakarta Timur, mereka panik lantaran melihat adanya razia kepolisian di depan Polsek Duren Sawit. Asido pun telah memutuskan untuk membelokkan mobilnya ke arah TPU Pondok Kelapa untuk dapat menghindari razia.
Begitu tiba di TPU tersebut, Asido dan Daniel kemudian turun dari mobil dan meninggalkan mobil berisi jasad Feby. Aki mobilnya sempat mereka ambil untuk digunakan di mobil Daihatsu Xenia miliknya yang sudah lama mangkrak. Di situlah gerak-gerik pelaku akhirnya telah diketahui petugas keamanan.
Editor : Dian Sukmawati
UNITED NATIONS — Wearing pinstripes and a pince-nez, Staffan de Mistura, the United Nations envoy for Syria, arrived at the Security Council one Tuesday afternoon in February and announced that President Bashar al-Assad had agreed to halt airstrikes over Aleppo. Would the rebels, Mr. de Mistura suggested, agree to halt their shelling?
What he did not announce, but everyone knew by then, was that the Assad government had begun a military offensive to encircle opposition-held enclaves in Aleppo and that fierce fighting was underway. It would take only a few days for rebel leaders, having pushed back Syrian government forces, to outright reject Mr. de Mistura’s proposed freeze in the fighting, dooming the latest diplomatic overture on Syria.
Diplomacy is often about appearing to be doing something until the time is ripe for a deal to be done.
Now, with Mr. Assad’s forces having suffered a string of losses on the battlefield and the United States reaching at least a partial rapprochement with Mr. Assad’s main backer, Iran, Mr. de Mistura is changing course. Starting Monday, he is set to hold a series of closed talks in Geneva with the warring sides and their main supporters. Iran will be among them.
In an interview at United Nations headquarters last week, Mr. de Mistura hinted that the changing circumstances, both military and diplomatic, may have prompted various backers of the war to question how much longer the bloodshed could go on.
“Will that have an impact in accelerating the willingness for a political solution? We need to test it,” he said. “The Geneva consultations may be a good umbrella for testing that. It’s an occasion for asking everyone, including the government, if there is any new way that they are looking at a political solution, as they too claim they want.”
He said he would have a better assessment at the end of June, when he expects to wrap up his consultations. That coincides with the deadline for a final agreement in the Iran nuclear talks.
Whether a nuclear deal with Iran will pave the way for a new opening on peace talks in Syria remains to be seen. Increasingly, though, world leaders are explicitly linking the two, with the European Union’s top diplomat, Federica Mogherini, suggesting last week that a nuclear agreement could spur Tehran to play “a major but positive role in Syria.”
It could hardly come soon enough. Now in its fifth year, the Syrian war has claimed 220,000 lives, prompted an exodus of more than three million refugees and unleashed jihadist groups across the region. “This conflict is producing a question mark in many — where is it leading and whether this can be sustained,” Mr. de Mistura said.
Part Italian, part Swedish, Mr. de Mistura has worked with the United Nations for more than 40 years, but he is more widely known for his dapper style than for any diplomatic coups. Syria is by far the toughest assignment of his career — indeed, two of the organization’s most seasoned diplomats, Lakhdar Brahimi and Kofi Annan, tried to do the job and gave up — and critics have wondered aloud whether Mr. de Mistura is up to the task.
He served as a United Nations envoy in Afghanistan and Iraq, and before that in Lebanon, where a former minister recalled, with some scorn, that he spent many hours sunbathing at a private club in the hills above Beirut. Those who know him say he has a taste for fine suits and can sometimes speak too soon and too much, just as they point to his diplomatic missteps and hyperbole.
They cite, for instance, a news conference in October, when he raised the specter of Srebrenica, where thousands of Muslims were massacred in 1995 during the Balkans war, in warning that the Syrian border town of Kobani could fall to the Islamic State. In February, he was photographed at a party in Damascus, the Syrian capital, celebrating the anniversary of the Iranian revolution just as Syrian forces, aided by Iran, were pummeling rebel-held suburbs of Damascus; critics seized on that as evidence of his coziness with the government.
Mouin Rabbani, who served briefly as the head of Mr. de Mistura’s political affairs unit and has since emerged as one of his most outspoken critics, said Mr. de Mistura did not have the background necessary for the job. “This isn’t someone well known for his political vision or political imagination, and his closest confidants lack the requisite knowledge and experience,” Mr. Rabbani said.
As a deputy foreign minister in the Italian government, Mr. de Mistura was tasked in 2012 with freeing two Italian marines detained in India for shooting at Indian fishermen. He made 19 trips to India, to little effect. One marine was allowed to return to Italy for medical reasons; the other remains in India.
He said he initially turned down the Syria job when the United Nations secretary general approached him last August, only to change his mind the next day, after a sleepless, guilt-ridden night.
Mr. de Mistura compared his role in Syria to that of a doctor faced with a terminally ill patient. His goal in brokering a freeze in the fighting, he said, was to alleviate suffering. He settled on Aleppo as the location for its “fame,” he said, a decision that some questioned, considering that Aleppo was far trickier than the many other lesser-known towns where activists had negotiated temporary local cease-fires.
“Everybody, at least in Europe, are very familiar with the value of Aleppo,” Mr. de Mistura said. “So I was using that as an icebreaker.”
The cease-fire negotiations, to which he had devoted six months, fell apart quickly because of the government’s military offensive in Aleppo the very day of his announcement at the Security Council. Privately, United Nations diplomats said Mr. de Mistura had been manipulated. To this, Mr. de Mistura said only that he was “disappointed and concerned.”
Tarek Fares, a former rebel fighter, said after a recent visit to Aleppo that no Syrian would admit publicly to supporting Mr. de Mistura’s cease-fire proposal. “If anyone said they went to a de Mistura meeting in Gaziantep, they would be arrested,” is how he put it, referring to the Turkish city where negotiations between the two sides were held.
Secretary General Ban Ki-moon remains staunchly behind Mr. de Mistura’s efforts. His defenders point out that he is at the center of one of the world’s toughest diplomatic problems, charged with mediating a conflict in which two of the world’s most powerful nations — Russia, which supports Mr. Assad, and the United States, which has called for his ouster — remain deadlocked.
R. Nicholas Burns, a former State Department official who now teaches at Harvard, credited Mr. de Mistura for trying to negotiate a cease-fire even when the chances of success were exceedingly small — and the chances of a political deal even smaller. For his efforts to work, Professor Burns argued, the world powers will first have to come to an agreement of their own.
“He needs the help of outside powers,” he said. “It starts with backers of Assad. That’s Russia and Iran. De Mistura is there, waiting.”
Even as a high school student, Dave Goldberg was urging female classmates to speak up. As a young dot-com executive, he had one girlfriend after another, but fell hard for a driven friend named Sheryl Sandberg, pining after her for years. After they wed, Mr. Goldberg pushed her to negotiate hard for high compensation and arranged his schedule so that he could be home with their children when she was traveling for work.
Mr. Goldberg, who died unexpectedly on Friday, was a genial, 47-year-old Silicon Valley entrepreneur who built his latest company, SurveyMonkey, from a modest enterprise to one recently valued by investors at $2 billion. But he was also perhaps the signature male feminist of his era: the first major chief executive in memory to spur his wife to become as successful in business as he was, and an essential figure in “Lean In,” Ms. Sandberg’s blockbuster guide to female achievement.
Over the weekend, even strangers were shocked at his death, both because of his relatively young age and because they knew of him as the living, breathing, car-pooling center of a new philosophy of two-career marriage.
“They were very much the role models for what this next generation wants to grapple with,” said Debora L. Spar, the president of Barnard College. In a 2011 commencement speech there, Ms. Sandberg told the graduates that whom they married would be their most important career decision.
In the play “The Heidi Chronicles,” revived on Broadway this spring, a male character who is the founder of a media company says that “I don’t want to come home to an A-plus,” explaining that his ambitions require him to marry an unthreatening helpmeet. Mr. Goldberg grew up to hold the opposite view, starting with his upbringing in progressive Minneapolis circles where “there was woman power in every aspect of our lives,” Jeffrey Dachis, a childhood friend, said in an interview.
The Goldberg parents read “The Feminine Mystique” together — in fact, Mr. Goldberg’s father introduced it to his wife, according to Ms. Sandberg’s book. In 1976, Paula Goldberg helped found a nonprofit to aid children with disabilities. Her husband, Mel, a law professor who taught at night, made the family breakfast at home.
Later, when Dave Goldberg was in high school and his prom date, Jill Chessen, stayed silent in a politics class, he chastised her afterward. He said, “You need to speak up,” Ms. Chessen recalled in an interview. “They need to hear your voice.”
Years later, when Karin Gilford, an early employee at Launch Media, Mr. Goldberg’s digital music company, became a mother, he knew exactly what to do. He kept giving her challenging assignments, she recalled, but also let her work from home one day a week. After Yahoo acquired Launch, Mr. Goldberg became known for distributing roses to all the women in the office on Valentine’s Day.
Ms. Sandberg, who often describes herself as bossy-in-a-good-way, enchanted him when they became friendly in the mid-1990s. He “was smitten with her,” Ms. Chessen remembered. Ms. Sandberg was dating someone else, but Mr. Goldberg still hung around, even helping her and her then-boyfriend move, recalled Bob Roback, a friend and co-founder of Launch. When they finally married in 2004, friends remember thinking how similar the two were, and that the qualities that might have made Ms. Sandberg intimidating to some men drew Mr. Goldberg to her even more.
Over the next decade, Mr. Goldberg and Ms. Sandberg pioneered new ways of capturing information online, had a son and then a daughter, became immensely wealthy, and hashed out their who-does-what-in-this-marriage issues. Mr. Goldberg’s commute from the Bay Area to Los Angeles became a strain, so he relocated, later joking that he “lost the coin flip” of where they would live. He paid the bills, she planned the birthday parties, and both often left their offices at 5:30 so they could eat dinner with their children before resuming work afterward.
Friends in Silicon Valley say they were careful to conduct their careers separately, politely refusing when outsiders would ask one about the other’s work: Ms. Sandberg’s role building Facebook into an information and advertising powerhouse, and Mr. Goldberg at SurveyMonkey, which made polling faster and cheaper. But privately, their work was intertwined. He often began statements to his team with the phrase “Well, Sheryl said” sharing her business advice. He counseled her, too, starting with her salary negotiations with Mark Zuckerberg.
“I wanted Mark to really feel he stretched to get Sheryl, because she was worth it,” Mr. Goldberg explained in a 2013 “60 Minutes” interview, his Minnesota accent and his smile intact as he offered a rare peek of the intersection of marriage and money at the top of corporate life.
While his wife grew increasingly outspoken about women’s advancement, Mr. Goldberg quietly advised the men in the office on family and partnership matters, an associate said. Six out of 16 members of SurveyMonkey’s management team are female, an almost unheard-of ratio among Silicon Valley “unicorns,” or companies valued at over $1 billion.
When Mellody Hobson, a friend and finance executive, wrote a chapter of “Lean In” about women of color for the college edition of the book, Mr. Goldberg gave her feedback on the draft, a clue to his deep involvement. He joked with Ms. Hobson that she was too long-winded, like Ms. Sandberg, but aside from that, he said he loved the chapter, she said in an interview.
By then, Mr. Goldberg was a figure of fascination who inspired a “where can I get one of those?” reaction among many of the women who had read the best seller “Lean In.” Some lamented that Ms. Sandberg’s advice hinged too much on marrying a Dave Goldberg, who was humble enough to plan around his wife, attentive enough to worry about which shoes his young daughter would wear, and rich enough to help pay for the help that made the family’s balancing act manageable.
Now that he is gone, and Ms. Sandberg goes from being half of a celebrated partnership to perhaps the business world’s most prominent single mother, the pages of “Lean In” carry a new sting of loss.
“We are never at 50-50 at any given moment — perfect equality is hard to define or sustain — but we allow the pendulum to swing back and forth between us,” she wrote in 2013, adding that they were looking forward to raising teenagers together.
“Fortunately, I have Dave to figure it out with me,” she wrote.