Sudah kita fahami bersama
bahwa tugas pokok hidup manusia di dunia ini adalah beribadah kepada Alloh, dan kita ketahui pula
bahwa melaksanakan ibadah itu harus benar , artinya benar sesuai perintah dan petunjuk dari Alloh
dan Rasulnya, maka agar ibadah kita ini tidak sia-sia , tidak musfro (tidak ada hasilnya) tetapi
benar-benar diterima oleh Alloh, mendapatkan pahala dan dibalas Surga, maka terlebih dahulu kita
tahu dan memahami peraturan2 dan garis2 dari Alloh dan Rasululloh SAW yang tertulis didalam Al-
Quran dan Al-Hadist ,
Saco-Indonesia.com, Sudah kita fahami bersama bahwa tugas pokok hidup
manusia di dunia ini adalah beribadah kepada Alloh, dan kita ketahui pula bahwa
melaksanakan ibadah itu harus benar , artinya benar sesuai perintah dan petunjuk dari Alloh dan
Rasulnya, maka agar ibadah kita ini tidak sia-sia , tidak musfro (tidak ada hasilnya) tetapi
benar-benar diterima oleh Alloh, mendapatkan pahala dan dibalas Surga, maka terlebih dahulu kita
tahu dan memahami peraturan2 dan garis2 dari Alloh dan Rasululloh SAW yang tertulis
didalam Al-Quran dan Al-Hadist ,
Al-Quran à sebagai Huda Linnas
petunjuk bagi manusia dan Basyoirulinnas
peneropong bagi manusia.....
Al-Hadist à Sebagai contoh dan peraktek ibadah yang
telah dikerjakan oleh Rasululloh SAW .
Maka dengan memahami isi Quran dan Hadist kita
dgn jelas kita bisa membedakan antara yg perintah dan larangan, antara yg haq dan yang batal,
antara yg pahala dan dosa, antara yg halal dan harom dllsb. Disamping itu didalam melaksanakan
ibadah kita yakin dan mantap bahwa ibadah yang kita kerjakan ini pasti benarnya, pasti syahnya,
pasti diterima Alloh dan yakin di balas Surga ........ firman Alloh dalam Al-Quran surat Al-
Anam ayat 153
Dan sesungguhnya ini (Al-Quran) adalah jalan-Ku (Alloh)
yang benar maka ikutilah Al-Quran dan jangan mengikuti beberapa jalan (selain Al-Quran) maka
beberapa jalan itu akan memisahkan kamu dari jalan Alloh, Demikian itu Alloh wasiat padamu agar
Dan firman Alloh lagi dalam surat Al-Imran 31
Ktakanlah (Muhammad) jika kamu cinta pada Alloh maka ikutilah aku (nabi) maka Alloh akan
cinta kepadamu dan mengampuni dosa kamu. Adapun Alloh Maha Pengampun lagi Penyayang.
Dan sabda Rasululloh SAW dalam riwayat Malik Muwatto’
Artinya: Telah kutinggalkan padamu 2 (dua) perkara yg kamu tidak akan tersesat selama
berpegang teguh dengan 2 perkara tersebut yaitu : KITABULLOH (Al-Quran) dan sunnah
Dan sebaliknya dalam melaksanakan ibadah
jangan sekali-kali berdasarkan keyakinan dan pendapat sendiri atau pendapat seseorang atau
menurut keyakinan orang dalam melaksanakan ibadah, dengan kata lain hanya berdasarkan tulisan-
tulisan atau kitab-kitab selain Quran dan Hadist yg belum jelas kebenarannya dan tidak ada
jaminan kebenaran dari Alloh dan rasulnya yg akibatnya pasti akan menyimpang dari jalan
kebenaran, maka ini pasti menjadi orang yg tersesat, menjadi orang yang dalam Al-Quran disebut
نَاصِبَةٌ = amalanya membuat musibah
berdasarkan firman Alloh dalam Al-Quran surat Al-Anam 116
Artinya: Dan jika kamu (muhammad) mengikuti kebanyakan orang yg ada diatas bumi mereka
akan menyesatkan mu dari jalan Alloh. Tidak ada mereka kecuali hanya mengikuti perasangkaan
sendiri dan hanya berbuat dusta.
Dan ada lagi firman Alloh dalam surat Al-Baqoroh
Artinya: maka neraka Wail bagi orang2 yg menulis kitab dengan tangan
mereka dan mereka mengatakan bahwa ini dari sisi Alloh,mereka menukarkan/ menjual kitab Alloh
dengan harga yg sedikit (demi kepentingan dunia) maka neraka wail bagi mereka yang menulis kitab
dengan tangan mereka dan neraka wail pula bagi yang mengerjakannya.
demikian ........ kita sebagai umat Islam harus menyadari bahwa bicara masalah agama dan
masalah ibadah tidk dapat diukur dengan landasan pemikiran manusia.
Jika Alloh dan
Rasulnya telah menetapkan bahwa itu benar........ kendatipun kebanyakan orang mengatakan
salah...... dan akal kita tidak dapat menerimanya, akan tetapi itulah yang benar..........
Demikian pula sebaliknya jika Alloh dan RasulNYa telah perintahkan suatu perkara maka
harus diterima seutuhnya...... dan apa adanya.... tidak boleh ditambah ataupun di kurangi sebab
apa... menambah urusan ibadah berart BID”AH dan mengurangi urusan ibadah adalah
Semoga nasehat ini bermanfaat bagi kita
Oleh : H. Dar(ldii)
Sumber:Al'Quran & Al'Hadist
kau yang di sana
kau yang di sana
ada suka yang menggila
mengenalku mendekati aku
aku mau tapi malu
ku suka matamu hidungmu wajahmu
dan aku mau untuk jadi milikku
aku mau tapi malu
ku suka gayamu tingkahku senyummu
tapi ku malu tuk katakan padanya
aku yang selalu
punya sejuta cara
cara tuk merayu
tapi yang terjadi
aku seperti ini
ku bingung sendiri
back to * , back to Reff
aku suka aku mau
tapi sungguh aku malu
aku diam aku bingung
aku harus bagaimana
oh tuhanku tolong aku
mengapa aku jadi bodoh
ku tak tahu kenapa aku
tiba tiba jadi malu
ku tak tahu, tak tahu, tak tahu
ku tak tahu, tak tahu
back to Reff
aku mau tapi malu.. ( mau tuk jadi milikku )
aku mau tapi malu.. ( ku suka tetapi ku malu )
aku mau.. ( matamu hidungmu wajahmu )
tapi malu.. ( ku mau tuk jadi milikku )
aku mau.. ( gayamu senyummu tingkahmu )
tapi malu.. ( ku suka tetapi ku malu )
aku mau.. tapi malu
Editor : dian sukmawati
From sea to shining sea, or at least from one side of the Hudson to the other, politicians you have barely heard of are being accused of wrongdoing. There were so many court proceedings involving public officials on Monday that it was hard to keep up.
In Newark, two underlings of Gov. Chris Christie were arraigned on charges that they were in on the truly deranged plot to block traffic leading onto the George Washington Bridge.
Ten miles away, in Lower Manhattan, Dean G. Skelos, the leader of the New York State Senate, and his son, Adam B. Skelos, were arrested by the Federal Bureau of Investigation on accusations of far more conventional political larceny, involving a job with a sewer company for the son and commissions on title insurance and bond work.
The younger man managed to receive a 150 percent pay increase from the sewer company even though, as he said on tape, he “literally knew nothing about water or, you know, any of that stuff,” according to a criminal complaint the United States attorney’s office filed.
The success of Adam Skelos, 32, was attributed by prosecutors to his father’s influence as the leader of the Senate and as a potentate among state Republicans. The indictment can also be read as one of those unfailingly sad tales of a father who cannot stop indulging a grown son. The senator himself is not alleged to have profited from the schemes, except by being relieved of the burden of underwriting Adam.
The bridge traffic caper is its own species of crazy; what distinguishes the charges against the two Skeloses is the apparent absence of a survival instinct. It is one thing not to know anything about water or that stuff. More remarkable, if true, is the fact that the sewer machinations continued even after the former New York Assembly speaker, Sheldon Silver, was charged in January with taking bribes disguised as fees.
It was by then common gossip in political and news media circles that Senator Skelos, a Republican, the counterpart in the Senate to Mr. Silver, a Democrat, in the Assembly, could be next in line for the criminal dock. “Stay tuned,” the United States attorney, Preet Bharara said, leaving not much to the imagination.
Even though the cat had been unmistakably belled, Skelos father and son continued to talk about how to advance the interests of the sewer company, though the son did begin to use a burner cellphone, the kind people pay for in cash, with no traceable contracts.
That was indeed prudent, as prosecutors had been wiretapping the cellphones of both men. But it would seem that the burner was of limited value, because by then the prosecutors had managed to secure the help of a business executive who agreed to record calls with the Skeloses. It would further seem that the business executive was more attentive to the perils of pending investigations than the politician.
Through the end of the New York State budget negotiations in March, the hopes of the younger Skelos rested on his father’s ability to devise legislation that would benefit the sewer company. That did not pan out. But Senator Skelos did boast that he had haggled with Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, a Democrat, in a successful effort to raise a $150 million allocation for Long Island to $550 million, for what the budget called “transformative economic development projects.” It included money for the kind of work done by the sewer company.
The lawyer for Adam Skelos said he was not guilty and would win in court. Senator Skelos issued a ringing declaration that he was unequivocally innocent.
THIS was also the approach taken in New Jersey by Bill Baroni, a man of great presence and eloquence who stopped outside the federal courthouse to note that he had taken risks as a Republican by bucking his party to support paid family leave, medical marijuana and marriage equality. “I would never risk my career, my job, my reputation for something like this,” Mr. Baroni said. “I am an innocent man.”
The lawyer for his co-defendant, Bridget Anne Kelly, the former deputy chief of staff to Mr. Christie, a Republican, said that she would strongly rebut the charges.
Perhaps they had nothing to do with the lane closings. But neither Mr. Baroni nor Ms. Kelly addressed the question of why they did not return repeated calls from the mayor of Fort Lee, N.J., begging them to stop the traffic tie-ups, over three days.
That silence was a low moment. But perhaps New York hit bottom faster. Senator Skelos, the prosecutors charged, arranged to meet Long Island politicians at the wake of Wenjian Liu, a New York City police officer shot dead in December, to press for payments to the company employing his son.
Sometimes it seems as though for some people, the only thing to be ashamed of is shame itself.
UNITED NATIONS — Wearing pinstripes and a pince-nez, Staffan de Mistura, the United Nations envoy for Syria, arrived at the Security Council one Tuesday afternoon in February and announced that President Bashar al-Assad had agreed to halt airstrikes over Aleppo. Would the rebels, Mr. de Mistura suggested, agree to halt their shelling?
What he did not announce, but everyone knew by then, was that the Assad government had begun a military offensive to encircle opposition-held enclaves in Aleppo and that fierce fighting was underway. It would take only a few days for rebel leaders, having pushed back Syrian government forces, to outright reject Mr. de Mistura’s proposed freeze in the fighting, dooming the latest diplomatic overture on Syria.
Diplomacy is often about appearing to be doing something until the time is ripe for a deal to be done.
Now, with Mr. Assad’s forces having suffered a string of losses on the battlefield and the United States reaching at least a partial rapprochement with Mr. Assad’s main backer, Iran, Mr. de Mistura is changing course. Starting Monday, he is set to hold a series of closed talks in Geneva with the warring sides and their main supporters. Iran will be among them.
In an interview at United Nations headquarters last week, Mr. de Mistura hinted that the changing circumstances, both military and diplomatic, may have prompted various backers of the war to question how much longer the bloodshed could go on.
“Will that have an impact in accelerating the willingness for a political solution? We need to test it,” he said. “The Geneva consultations may be a good umbrella for testing that. It’s an occasion for asking everyone, including the government, if there is any new way that they are looking at a political solution, as they too claim they want.”
He said he would have a better assessment at the end of June, when he expects to wrap up his consultations. That coincides with the deadline for a final agreement in the Iran nuclear talks.
Whether a nuclear deal with Iran will pave the way for a new opening on peace talks in Syria remains to be seen. Increasingly, though, world leaders are explicitly linking the two, with the European Union’s top diplomat, Federica Mogherini, suggesting last week that a nuclear agreement could spur Tehran to play “a major but positive role in Syria.”
It could hardly come soon enough. Now in its fifth year, the Syrian war has claimed 220,000 lives, prompted an exodus of more than three million refugees and unleashed jihadist groups across the region. “This conflict is producing a question mark in many — where is it leading and whether this can be sustained,” Mr. de Mistura said.
Part Italian, part Swedish, Mr. de Mistura has worked with the United Nations for more than 40 years, but he is more widely known for his dapper style than for any diplomatic coups. Syria is by far the toughest assignment of his career — indeed, two of the organization’s most seasoned diplomats, Lakhdar Brahimi and Kofi Annan, tried to do the job and gave up — and critics have wondered aloud whether Mr. de Mistura is up to the task.
He served as a United Nations envoy in Afghanistan and Iraq, and before that in Lebanon, where a former minister recalled, with some scorn, that he spent many hours sunbathing at a private club in the hills above Beirut. Those who know him say he has a taste for fine suits and can sometimes speak too soon and too much, just as they point to his diplomatic missteps and hyperbole.
They cite, for instance, a news conference in October, when he raised the specter of Srebrenica, where thousands of Muslims were massacred in 1995 during the Balkans war, in warning that the Syrian border town of Kobani could fall to the Islamic State. In February, he was photographed at a party in Damascus, the Syrian capital, celebrating the anniversary of the Iranian revolution just as Syrian forces, aided by Iran, were pummeling rebel-held suburbs of Damascus; critics seized on that as evidence of his coziness with the government.
Mouin Rabbani, who served briefly as the head of Mr. de Mistura’s political affairs unit and has since emerged as one of his most outspoken critics, said Mr. de Mistura did not have the background necessary for the job. “This isn’t someone well known for his political vision or political imagination, and his closest confidants lack the requisite knowledge and experience,” Mr. Rabbani said.
As a deputy foreign minister in the Italian government, Mr. de Mistura was tasked in 2012 with freeing two Italian marines detained in India for shooting at Indian fishermen. He made 19 trips to India, to little effect. One marine was allowed to return to Italy for medical reasons; the other remains in India.
He said he initially turned down the Syria job when the United Nations secretary general approached him last August, only to change his mind the next day, after a sleepless, guilt-ridden night.
Mr. de Mistura compared his role in Syria to that of a doctor faced with a terminally ill patient. His goal in brokering a freeze in the fighting, he said, was to alleviate suffering. He settled on Aleppo as the location for its “fame,” he said, a decision that some questioned, considering that Aleppo was far trickier than the many other lesser-known towns where activists had negotiated temporary local cease-fires.
“Everybody, at least in Europe, are very familiar with the value of Aleppo,” Mr. de Mistura said. “So I was using that as an icebreaker.”
The cease-fire negotiations, to which he had devoted six months, fell apart quickly because of the government’s military offensive in Aleppo the very day of his announcement at the Security Council. Privately, United Nations diplomats said Mr. de Mistura had been manipulated. To this, Mr. de Mistura said only that he was “disappointed and concerned.”
Tarek Fares, a former rebel fighter, said after a recent visit to Aleppo that no Syrian would admit publicly to supporting Mr. de Mistura’s cease-fire proposal. “If anyone said they went to a de Mistura meeting in Gaziantep, they would be arrested,” is how he put it, referring to the Turkish city where negotiations between the two sides were held.
Secretary General Ban Ki-moon remains staunchly behind Mr. de Mistura’s efforts. His defenders point out that he is at the center of one of the world’s toughest diplomatic problems, charged with mediating a conflict in which two of the world’s most powerful nations — Russia, which supports Mr. Assad, and the United States, which has called for his ouster — remain deadlocked.
R. Nicholas Burns, a former State Department official who now teaches at Harvard, credited Mr. de Mistura for trying to negotiate a cease-fire even when the chances of success were exceedingly small — and the chances of a political deal even smaller. For his efforts to work, Professor Burns argued, the world powers will first have to come to an agreement of their own.
“He needs the help of outside powers,” he said. “It starts with backers of Assad. That’s Russia and Iran. De Mistura is there, waiting.”