JUAL GENSET LOVOL MURAH DI JAKARTA

Genset Foton Murah di Pemalang Hubungi : 0821 - 1310 - 3112/(021) 9224 - 2423 PT. Tribuana Diesel Adalah penjualan Generating-Set (genset) berkualitas import (builtup) bagi anda yang membutuhkan product berkualitas serta pengadaan yang cepat urgent tanpa berbelit-belit, Genset kami di lengkapi dengan dokumen Certificate Of Original , Manual book engine dan manual book generator, Kami sediakan Genset kapasitas 10 Kva - 650Kva (ANDA PESAN KAMI ANTAR).

Genset Foton Murah di Pemalang Kami juga menerima pembuatan box silent dan perakitan diesel generator set. Produk kami meliputi berbagai diesel generator set model open, silent lokal yang ukuranya menyesuaikan lokasi pondasi genset, mobile/ trailer . Sebagian besar mesin kami menggunakan Merk : Perkins, Cummins, Deutz, Lovol, Isuzu Foton dengan generator Leroy Somer, Stamford, kualitas terbaik brushless alternator. Genset Foton Murah di Pemalang

Genset Foton Murah di Pemalang

Tag :
Jual Genset Lovol | Genset Foton Murah di Pemalang | Jual Genset Lovol kav 45 kva | jual genset lovol Kap 70 Kva Prime Power type 1004TG | Genset Lovol | Genset Lovol kav 45 kva | Jual Genset cummins |

genset Isuzu Foton 40 kVA silent bergaransi dan berkualitas di Pagar Alam

genset Isuzu Foton 40 kVA silent bergaransi dan berkualitas di Pagar Alam Hubungi : 0821 - 1310 - 3112/(021) 9224 - 2423 PT. Tribuana Diesel Adalah penjualan Generating-Set (genset) berkualitas import (builtup) bagi anda yang membutuhkan product berkualitas serta pengadaan yang cepat urgent tanpa berbelit-belit, Genset kami di lengkapi dengan dokumen Certificate Of Original , Manual book engine dan manual book generator, Kami sediakan Genset kapasitas 10 Kva - 650Kva (ANDA PESAN KAMI ANTAR). genset Isuzu Foton 40 kVA silent bergaransi dan berkualitas di Pagar Alam

Memiliki tubuh yang langsing dan ramping mungkin sudah menjadi keinginan hampir seluruh perempuan di belahan dunia manapun. Buka

Memiliki tubuh yang langsing dan ramping mungkin sudah menjadi keinginan hampir seluruh perempuan di belahan dunia manapun. Bukan hanya perempuan saja , bahkan kaum lelakipun kerap melakukan diet dan olah raga untuk dapat membentuk tubuhnya menjadi lebih atletis dan memperhatikan berat badan adalah seperti hal yang wajib yang harus dilakukan oleh mereka yang ingin penampilannya selalu bagus dan menarik.

Bukan hal yang asing lagi, banyak orang yang melakukan penurunan berat badan atau diet dengan cara yang tidak menyehatkan, merusak kesehatan, atau bahkan tidak lazim untuk bisa mendapatkan tubuh yang ideal. Demi berat badan yang ramping, langsing, dan penampilan menarik, banyak orang rela untuk mengeluarkan uang yang tidak sedikit, menempuh cara yang tidak baik bahkan melakukan hal hal yang bahaya yagi tubuhnya sendiri. Padahal, untuk bisa mendapatkan bentuk tubuh yang ideal dan langsing, tidak tidak perlu melakukan hal hal yang bisa sampai merusak dan membahayakan tubuh kita sendiri. Jangan demi jalan pintas yang cepat, kita mengesampingkan kesehatan tubuh kita. Asalkan dijalani dengan sungguh sungguh, dengan cara alami dan sehat pun kita bisa mendapatkan bentuk tubuh yang ideal.

Cara seperti apakah yang bisa kita lakukan untuk bisa melangsingkan tubuh kita tanpa merusak kesehatan dan merogoh kocek yang dalam? Yaitu dengan cara yang alami dan sehat, seperti berikut ini:

Cara menurunkan berat badan atau diet alami yang menyehatkan

Lakukan olah raga teratur. Olah raga tidak selalu harus pergi ke pusat kebugaran atau fitness. Olah raga juga bisa dilakukan di halaman rumah atau di komplek sekitar perumahan kita. Lakukan olah raga yang bisa membakar banyak lemak seperti bersepeda, lari pagi, sit up, berenang.

Pola makan yang tidak berlebihan dan teratur juga dapat mempengaruhi. Misalnya, makan makanan yang tidak mengandung banyak lemak. Perbanyaklah makanan sayur, buah, dan minum air putih yang cukup. Kurangi makanan berserat berat.

Disiplin untuk tidak mengemil di malam hari. Mengemil, yang kita anggap bisa menunda atau bahkan menghilangkan rasa lapar, ternyata juga bisa menambah berat badan.

Lakukan aktifitas rutin setiap hari, jangan banyak duduk menonton TV atau di tempat tidur karena itu bisa menimbun lemak di tubuh Anda. Bahkan juga bisa mengganggu kesehatan organ lainnya seperti jantung dan otak.

Berenang secara rutin. Selain dapat menimbulkan efek yang menyenangkan dan segar, berenang juga sangat bagus untuk metabolisme Anda.

 

saco-indonesia.com, Gubernur DKI Jakarta Joko Widodo mengaku mendukung Rancangan Undang-Undang Komponen Cadangan (Komcad) yang tengah digodok DPR RI yang berisi antara lain soal wajib militer.

JAKARTA, Saco- Indonesia.com — Gubernur DKI Jakarta Joko Widodo mengaku mendukung Rancangan Undang-Undang Komponen Cadangan (Komcad) yang tengah digodok DPR RI yang berisi antara lain soal wajib militer. Ia mengaku setuju jika wajib militer diterapkan bagi PNS dan sipil.

"Setuju, dalam rangka pertahanan negara, bagus itu," ujar Jokowi pada pembukaan HUT ke-486 DKI di Jakarta Timur, Minggu (2/6/2013).

Referensi untuk RUU tersebut diambil dari beberapa negara, yaitu Amerika Serikat, Jepang, dan Singapura.

Komisi I DPR Fraksi Partai Demorat, Hayono Isman, mengatakan, latihan yang diatur dalam UU Komcad merupakan salah satu bentuk persiapan jika sewaktu-waktu Indonesia diserang.

Bagian RUU Komcad yang bicara soal wajib militer antara lain Pasal 6 Ayat 3 dan Pasal 8 Ayat 3. 

Pasal 6 Ayat 3 RUU Komcad itu berbunyi, "Komponen Cadangan disusun dalam bentuk satuan tempur yang disesuaikan dengan struktur organisasi angkatan sesuai masing- masing matra." Adapun Pasal 8 Ayat 3 berbunyi, "Pegawai negeri sipil, pekerja, dan atau buruh yang telah memenuhi persyaratan wajib menjadi anggota komponen cadangan."

 
Editor :Liwon Maulana
Sumber:Kompas.com

WASHINGTON — The former deputy director of the C.I.A. asserts in a forthcoming book that Republicans, in their eagerness to politicize the killing of the American ambassador to Libya, repeatedly distorted the agency’s analysis of events. But he also argues that the C.I.A. should get out of the business of providing “talking points” for administration officials in national security events that quickly become partisan, as happened after the Benghazi attack in 2012.

The official, Michael J. Morell, dismisses the allegation that the United States military and C.I.A. officers “were ordered to stand down and not come to the rescue of their comrades,” and he says there is “no evidence” to support the charge that “there was a conspiracy between C.I.A. and the White House to spin the Benghazi story in a way that would protect the political interests of the president and Secretary Clinton,” referring to the secretary of state at the time, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

But he also concludes that the White House itself embellished some of the talking points provided by the Central Intelligence Agency and had blocked him from sending an internal study of agency conclusions to Congress.

Photo
 
Michael J. Morell Credit Mark Wilson/Getty Images

“I finally did so without asking,” just before leaving government, he writes, and after the White House released internal emails to a committee investigating the State Department’s handling of the issue.

A lengthy congressional investigation remains underway, one that many Republicans hope to use against Mrs. Clinton in the 2016 election cycle.

In parts of the book, “The Great War of Our Time” (Twelve), Mr. Morell praises his C.I.A. colleagues for many successes in stopping terrorist attacks, but he is surprisingly critical of other C.I.A. failings — and those of the National Security Agency.

Soon after Mr. Morell retired in 2013 after 33 years in the agency, President Obama appointed him to a commission reviewing the actions of the National Security Agency after the disclosures of Edward J. Snowden, a former intelligence contractor who released classified documents about the government’s eavesdropping abilities. Mr. Morell writes that he was surprised by what he found.

Advertisement

“You would have thought that of all the government entities on the planet, the one least vulnerable to such grand theft would have been the N.S.A.,” he writes. “But it turned out that the N.S.A. had left itself vulnerable.”

He concludes that most Wall Street firms had better cybersecurity than the N.S.A. had when Mr. Snowden swept information from its systems in 2013. While he said he found himself “chagrined by how well the N.S.A. was doing” compared with the C.I.A. in stepping up its collection of data on intelligence targets, he also sensed that the N.S.A., which specializes in electronic spying, was operating without considering the implications of its methods.

“The N.S.A. had largely been collecting information because it could, not necessarily in all cases because it should,” he says.

The book is to be released next week.

Mr. Morell was a career analyst who rose through the ranks of the agency, and he ended up in the No. 2 post. He served as President George W. Bush’s personal intelligence briefer in the first months of his presidency — in those days, he could often be spotted at the Starbucks in Waco, Tex., catching up on his reading — and was with him in the schoolhouse in Florida on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, when the Bush presidency changed in an instant.

Mr. Morell twice took over as acting C.I.A. director, first when Leon E. Panetta was appointed secretary of defense and then when retired Gen. David H. Petraeus resigned over an extramarital affair with his biographer, a relationship that included his handing her classified notes of his time as America’s best-known military commander.

Mr. Morell says he first learned of the affair from Mr. Petraeus only the night before he resigned, and just as the Benghazi events were turning into a political firestorm. While praising Mr. Petraeus, who had told his deputy “I am very lucky” to run the C.I.A., Mr. Morell writes that “the organization did not feel the same way about him.” The former general “created the impression through the tone of his voice and his body language that he did not want people to disagree with him (which was not true in my own interaction with him),” he says.

But it is his account of the Benghazi attacks — and how the C.I.A. was drawn into the debate over whether the Obama White House deliberately distorted its account of the death of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens — that is bound to attract attention, at least partly because of its relevance to the coming presidential election. The initial assessments that the C.I.A. gave to the White House said demonstrations had preceded the attack. By the time analysts reversed their opinion, Susan E. Rice, now the national security adviser, had made a series of statements on Sunday talk shows describing the initial assessment. The controversy and other comments Ms. Rice made derailed Mr. Obama’s plan to appoint her as secretary of state.

The experience prompted Mr. Morell to write that the C.I.A. should stay out of the business of preparing talking points — especially on issues that are being seized upon for “political purposes.” He is critical of the State Department for not beefing up security in Libya for its diplomats, as the C.I.A., he said, did for its employees.

But he concludes that the assault in which the ambassador was killed took place “with little or no advance planning” and “was not well organized.” He says the attackers “did not appear to be looking for Americans to harm. They appeared intent on looting and conducting some vandalism,” setting fires that killed Mr. Stevens and a security official, Sean Smith.

Mr. Morell paints a picture of an agency that was struggling, largely unsuccessfully, to understand dynamics in the Middle East and North Africa when the Arab Spring broke out in late 2011 in Tunisia. The agency’s analysts failed to see the forces of revolution coming — and then failed again, he writes, when they told Mr. Obama that the uprisings would undercut Al Qaeda by showing there was a democratic pathway to change.

“There is no good explanation for our not being able to see the pressures growing to dangerous levels across the region,” he writes. The agency had again relied too heavily “on a handful of strong leaders in the countries of concern to help us understand what was going on in the Arab street,” he says, and those leaders themselves were clueless.

Moreover, an agency that has always overvalued secretly gathered intelligence and undervalued “open source” material “was not doing enough to mine the wealth of information available through social media,” he writes. “We thought and told policy makers that this outburst of popular revolt would damage Al Qaeda by undermining the group’s narrative,” he writes.

Instead, weak governments in Egypt, and the absence of governance from Libya to Yemen, were “a boon to Islamic extremists across both the Middle East and North Africa.”

Mr. Morell is gentle about most of the politicians he dealt with — he expresses admiration for both Mr. Bush and Mr. Obama, though he accuses former Vice President Dick Cheney of deliberately implying a connection between Al Qaeda and Iraq that the C.I.A. had concluded probably did not exist. But when it comes to the events leading up to the Bush administration’s decision to go to war in Iraq, he is critical of his own agency.

Mr. Morell concludes that the Bush White House did not have to twist intelligence on Saddam Hussein’s alleged effort to rekindle the country’s work on weapons of mass destruction.

“The view that hard-liners in the Bush administration forced the intelligence community into its position on W.M.D. is just flat wrong,” he writes. “No one pushed. The analysts were already there and they had been there for years, long before Bush came to office.”

The career criminals in genre novels don’t have money problems. If they need some, they just go out and steal it. But such financial transactions can backfire, which is what happened back in 2004 when the Texas gang in Michael

Artikel lainnya »